Victorians push back against Labor’s gas phase-out as energy choice emerges as key election battleground

The Allan Government’s plan to gradually phase out natural gas in Victorian homes has come under renewed political pressure after new polling suggested a majority of voters oppose restrictions on gas use and want households to retain the freedom to choose their preferred energy source.

Natural gas stove in a Victorian home as debate over the state's gas phase-out intensifies

The findings arrive just months before Victoria heads to the polls, adding fresh momentum to what is rapidly becoming one of the defining policy debates of the state election campaign.

A JWS Research poll of 1,000 Victorian voters, commissioned by Australian Energy Producers, found strong support for retaining natural gas as part of the state’s long-term energy mix. According to the survey, 83 per cent of respondents supported keeping natural gas in Victoria’s future energy system, while 58 per cent opposed the government’s ban on new gas connections for new homes. Only 26 per cent backed the restriction.

The survey also found that 71 per cent of voters believed Victorians should continue to have the option of installing gas connections in newly built homes, while 80 per cent said consumers should be free to choose between gas and electric appliances when replacing existing equipment. More than half opposed the requirement for many gas hot water systems to be replaced with electric alternatives from March 2027.

The results represent a significant political challenge for Premier Jacinta Allan, whose government has made building electrification a central component of Victoria’s strategy to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions.

Under Victoria’s Gas Substitution Roadmap, the government is seeking to reduce reliance on fossil gas over coming decades by encouraging homes and businesses to transition towards electricity powered increasingly by renewable energy.

The roadmap includes ending new gas connections for most new residential developments, expanding energy-efficiency programs and promoting electric alternatives for heating, hot water and cooking.

The Allan Government argues that electrification will ultimately lower household emissions, improve energy efficiency and reduce long-term exposure to volatile gas prices while supporting Victoria’s broader climate commitments.

Ministers have repeatedly stated that buildings account for a substantial share of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions and that electrification is essential if Victoria is to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets.

Critics, however, contend the transition is occurring too quickly and risks limiting consumer choice.

Australian Energy Producers Victoria Director Peter Kos said the polling demonstrated that Victorians still regarded natural gas as an important source of reliable and affordable energy.

He noted that the Victorian gas industry contributes an estimated $22 billion in annual economic activity and supports around 40,000 jobs across the state. He argued gas remains critical not only for household cooking and heating but also for electricity generation and manufacturing.

“These polling results show Victorians recognise the important role natural gas plays in delivering reliable and affordable energy and they want to see that continue,” Kos said.

The survey also carried potential electoral implications.

More than half of respondents indicated they would be more likely to support candidates who defended consumer choice between gas and electricity, while a similar proportion said they favoured politicians committed to retaining natural gas as part of Victoria’s energy future.

Those findings suggest energy policy could become an increasingly influential issue as political parties seek to appeal to households concerned about living costs and rising energy bills.

The Victorian Coalition has strongly opposed mandatory restrictions on household gas use, arguing families should be free to decide which appliances best suit their needs and budgets.

Opposition MPs have accused the Allan Government of pursuing an ideological approach that places environmental objectives ahead of affordability and consumer choice.

Environmental organisations, meanwhile, maintain that reducing dependence on fossil gas is necessary if Australia is to meet long-term climate goals.

They argue that expanding renewable electricity generation, combined with increasingly efficient electric appliances such as heat pumps and induction cooktops, will reduce emissions while eventually lowering operating costs for households.

Energy experts note that the economics of electrification vary considerably depending on individual households.

Factors such as whether a property already has rooftop solar, battery storage, existing gas infrastructure or ageing appliances can significantly influence whether switching from gas to electricity results in financial savings.

For many Victorian households, replacing functioning gas appliances before the end of their useful life may involve substantial upfront costs, even if lower running costs are achieved over time.

Victoria’s energy transition is also occurring against the backdrop of broader challenges facing Australia’s east coast gas market.

Declining production from mature offshore gas fields, increasing domestic demand and uncertainty surrounding future investment have prompted ongoing debate over energy security and long-term supply.

Supporters of continued gas development argue additional local production is required to maintain reliable energy supplies during the transition to renewables.

Others contend that accelerating investment in renewable generation, electricity transmission and storage will reduce dependence on fossil fuels over the longer term.

The Allan Government has already adjusted aspects of its electrification agenda in response to community and industry feedback.

Earlier revisions clarified the scope of some proposed restrictions and provided additional transition periods for certain appliances, while maintaining the broader objective of reducing fossil gas consumption across Victoria.

Political analysts believe the debate reflects a broader tension confronting governments across Australia.

While there is widespread support for reducing emissions, disagreement remains over the pace of the transition, the technologies that should be prioritised and the balance between environmental objectives and household affordability.

Victoria has traditionally positioned itself as a national leader in climate policy, introducing ambitious renewable energy targets and major investments in offshore wind, transmission infrastructure and electrification initiatives.

Those policies have won support from climate advocates but have also become increasingly contentious as cost-of-living pressures remain a dominant concern for many voters.

With the state election approaching, energy policy is expected to feature prominently alongside housing affordability, healthcare, crime and infrastructure.

Whether the latest polling reflects a temporary reaction to rising household costs or signals a more durable shift in public sentiment will become clearer as campaigning intensifies.

For the Allan Government, the challenge will be convincing voters that electrification can deliver lower emissions without sacrificing affordability or reliability.

For the Opposition and industry groups, the focus is likely to remain on defending consumer choice and arguing that natural gas should continue playing a significant role in Victoria’s energy system during the transition to a lower-emissions economy.

Related Posts

Editorial illustration of Steven Miles and David Crisafulli in Queensland politics

Steven Miles Challenges Crisafulli Over Child Safety After Amanda Camm Quits

Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles has challenged Premier David Crisafulli to appoint an experienced replacement for Amanda Camm after she announced her decision to step down from the child safety and domestic and family violence portfolios. Miles says the choice will reveal how seriously the government takes services for vulnerable children and families. Crisafulli has praised Camm’s record and defended the reforms initiated during her term. Camm says her decision was personal and followed major surgery and an incomplete recovery. She has also referred to the stress of her ministerial workload and the impact of public harassment. Her resignation should not be portrayed as an admission that the criticism of her administration was correct. The policy dispute and the reasons she has given for leaving office are separate facts.

Editorial illustration of Sharon Freund and Michael Allen with courthouse imagery, not a photograph of proceedings

Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Watchdog Referral Amid Dispute With Michael Allen

NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has taken her challenge to a watchdog referral before the Court of Appeal amid a prolonged dispute involving Local Court Chief Judge Michael Allen. The latest proceedings concern whether decisions and observations arising from a Judicial Commission process were reached and handled lawfully. The legal contest remains unresolved, and the allegations at its centre must not be treated as disciplinary findings against either judge. Published accounts of the Court of Appeal proceedings say Freund’s lawyers have challenged the Attorney-General’s referral of her conduct to the NSW Judicial Commission. The dispute has been linked to questions about the handling of a criminal case involving a judicial colleague’s adult child and to competing allegations about procedural propriety. Those accounts remain contested, and the Court of Appeal’s task is not identical to a final disciplinary inquiry.

Editorial illustration of Angie Bell and Anne Aly, Australian parliamentary debate

Angie Bell Calls Stoning Remarks ‘Regrettable’ After Anne Aly Criticism

Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell has described her earlier parliamentary remarks about Small Business Minister Anne Aly and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as regrettable, calling them a poor choice of words after a furious public dispute over violent imagery in political debate. Bell says the comment was neither helpful nor planned, and that she withdrew it and tried to rectify the matter with Aly. The new statement follows criticism from Aly, who described the original language as racist and misogynistic. The exchange is significant not because the words have just been spoken, but because Bell has now publicly addressed them. Her expression of regret should be reported accurately without claiming that she accepted every criticism Aly made or that the parties have resolved their disagreement.

Editorial illustration of Nina Taylor and Fishermans Bend urban development

Nina Taylor Defends Fishermans Bend Plans as Rivals Demand Faster Transport

Labor MP Nina Taylor has defended the Victorian government’s approach to Fishermans Bend as rival candidates in the Albert Park electorate demanded faster public transport and better infrastructure for the growing inner-Melbourne precinct. The debate at a local election forum highlighted the gap between plans for a major urban renewal area and the transport connections residents and businesses can already use. Candidates questioned why promised tram and rail links remain distant prospects despite long-running plans to accommodate substantially more homes and jobs. Taylor pointed to recent planning steps, the Metro Tunnel and expanded bus services, while opponents pressed the government to deliver infrastructure earlier. The disagreement concerns priorities, funding and sequencing; a planning announcement should not be confused with a completed railway or tram service.

Editorial illustration of Angus Taylor and Chris Bowen with the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric project

Angus Taylor Demands Chris Bowen Resign Over Snowy 2.0 Cost Blowout

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has called for Energy Minister Chris Bowen to resign after Snowy Hydro revised the cost and completion forecast for Snowy 2.0, reviving a political argument over who is responsible for one of Australia’s most expensive energy projects. The company’s updated target is $22.2 billion, with an allowance for a cost of up to $25 billion, while commissioning is now expected in late 2029. The latest assessment is a major test for the Commonwealth-owned company and for governments of both political persuasions. Taylor was energy minister when the project was approved under the Coalition. Bowen, who oversees the project as a shareholder minister under Labor, says the early design and engineering assumptions left a lasting problem. Neither side’s political account changes the figures Australians now need to assess.

Editorial illustration of David Pocock and Anthony Albanese with parliamentary funding documents

David Pocock Challenges Albanese Over Helen Haines Funding Dossier

Independent senator David Pocock has challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s explanation of a document circulated from his office about fellow independent Helen Haines, drawing a sharp distinction between routine political briefing and material that can cast doubt on an MP’s integrity. Albanese says the file concerned Haines’s requests for funding for her electorate and was not intended as a personal attack. The row has taken on particular sensitivity after the alleged vehicle attack that left Haines critically injured. That incident is the subject of a separate criminal investigation. No established evidence links the circulation of the political document to the alleged attack or identifies political briefing as a motive. Treating the two events as causally connected would go beyond the facts.