Tony Abbott says multiculturalism has failed as debate over Australia’s national identity intensifies

Former prime minister Tony Abbott has reignited one of Australia’s most contentious political debates, declaring that multiculturalism has failed and arguing that “diversity is not our strength” as the country grapples with questions about immigration, social cohesion and national identity.

Former prime minister Tony Abbott speaks about multiculturalism and Australia's national identity

Abbott made the comments in a video shared by former deputy prime minister John Anderson, who argued Australia needed to rediscover a stronger shared national identity.

In the video, Abbott said Australia should welcome migrants who embrace the nation’s democratic values while warning that policies encouraging separate cultural identities had weakened social cohesion.

“Plainly, multiculturalism has failed and diversity is not our strength,” Abbott said.

He argued the Bondi terrorist attack should serve as a wake-up call for Australia to “celebrate diversity less and unity more” while preserving what he described as the country’s national character.

Abbott stressed that his criticism was directed at multicultural policy rather than immigration itself.

He said migrants who share Australian values strengthen the nation, but argued problems arise when newcomers fail to integrate into the broader community.

“If immigrants share our values and want to join Team Australia, our country grows stronger,” Abbott said.

“But if they just want to live in hotel Australia and take advantage of the facilities, our country becomes more fragmented and more divided.”

The former Liberal leader argued that previous generations of migrants were expected to integrate quickly into Australian society, whereas modern multicultural policies encouraged people to retain separate cultural identities for longer.

According to Abbott, Australia should remain open to people of every race and religion provided they respect the country’s democratic institutions, freedoms and laws.

He also said migration should ensure “tomorrow’s Australia” remained recognisably connected to the nation Australians know today.

Abbott’s intervention comes amid an increasingly heated national discussion over multiculturalism, immigration levels and social cohesion following recent political and security debates.

The issue gained renewed prominence after One Nation leader Pauline Hanson argued Australia should become “monocultural”, saying the nation should embrace a single unifying culture while remaining multiracial.

Her comments generated widespread political debate across Parliament and placed pressure on Opposition Leader Angus Taylor to clarify the Coalition’s position.

Initially, Taylor repeatedly declined to explicitly endorse multiculturalism when questioned by journalists, instead emphasising that migrants should share Australia’s values and obey its laws. After several days of criticism, he clarified that he supports a version of multiculturalism based on common civic values rather than what he described as Labor’s approach.

Taylor later rejected suggestions Australia should resemble a monocultural country such as Japan, saying he wanted Australia “to look like Australia” while maintaining shared national values.

Other senior Coalition figures have also offered differing perspectives.

Leadership contender Andrew Hastie criticised the idea of monoculturalism while describing multiculturalism as a politically loaded term, and senior Liberals including Andrew McLachlan and Ted O’Brien have publicly defended Australia’s multicultural character.

The debate has also highlighted differences between current and former Liberal leaders.

While Abbott argues multiculturalism has evolved into an ideology that weakens national unity, former prime minister John Howard has continued to defend Australia’s multicultural success, arguing the country has demonstrated that people from many backgrounds can integrate successfully while embracing Australian values.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has strongly rejected suggestions Australia should move away from multiculturalism.

He has argued Australia has “never been a monocultural society” and that successive generations of migrants have helped build the modern nation.

According to Albanese, Australia’s diversity has generally strengthened the country rather than weakened it.

The dispute reflects broader concerns about immigration, housing affordability, infrastructure pressures and community cohesion that have become increasingly prominent in Australian politics.

Opinion polling has suggested public attitudes toward multiculturalism remain generally positive but have become more divided than in previous years, particularly following debates over migration levels and national security.

Australia has operated an official multicultural policy for decades, encouraging migrants to maintain aspects of their cultural heritage while participating fully in Australian civic life.

Supporters argue the policy has helped one of the world’s most culturally diverse countries remain relatively stable despite welcoming millions of migrants from every continent.

Critics, however, argue that multiculturalism has shifted away from encouraging integration and has instead promoted separate cultural identities at the expense of national unity.

Abbott has repeatedly advanced that argument in speeches and essays throughout the past year, contending that Australia should place greater emphasis on assimilation, shared values and national identity while reducing immigration until infrastructure and social cohesion improve.

The latest intervention ensures multiculturalism will remain a central issue in Australia’s political debate as parties compete to define how the country should balance immigration, diversity and national cohesion in the years ahead.

Related Posts

Editorial illustration of Steven Miles and David Crisafulli in Queensland politics

Steven Miles Challenges Crisafulli Over Child Safety After Amanda Camm Quits

Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles has challenged Premier David Crisafulli to appoint an experienced replacement for Amanda Camm after she announced her decision to step down from the child safety and domestic and family violence portfolios. Miles says the choice will reveal how seriously the government takes services for vulnerable children and families. Crisafulli has praised Camm’s record and defended the reforms initiated during her term. Camm says her decision was personal and followed major surgery and an incomplete recovery. She has also referred to the stress of her ministerial workload and the impact of public harassment. Her resignation should not be portrayed as an admission that the criticism of her administration was correct. The policy dispute and the reasons she has given for leaving office are separate facts.

Editorial illustration of Sharon Freund and Michael Allen with courthouse imagery, not a photograph of proceedings

Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Watchdog Referral Amid Dispute With Michael Allen

NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has taken her challenge to a watchdog referral before the Court of Appeal amid a prolonged dispute involving Local Court Chief Judge Michael Allen. The latest proceedings concern whether decisions and observations arising from a Judicial Commission process were reached and handled lawfully. The legal contest remains unresolved, and the allegations at its centre must not be treated as disciplinary findings against either judge. Published accounts of the Court of Appeal proceedings say Freund’s lawyers have challenged the Attorney-General’s referral of her conduct to the NSW Judicial Commission. The dispute has been linked to questions about the handling of a criminal case involving a judicial colleague’s adult child and to competing allegations about procedural propriety. Those accounts remain contested, and the Court of Appeal’s task is not identical to a final disciplinary inquiry.

Editorial illustration of Angie Bell and Anne Aly, Australian parliamentary debate

Angie Bell Calls Stoning Remarks ‘Regrettable’ After Anne Aly Criticism

Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell has described her earlier parliamentary remarks about Small Business Minister Anne Aly and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as regrettable, calling them a poor choice of words after a furious public dispute over violent imagery in political debate. Bell says the comment was neither helpful nor planned, and that she withdrew it and tried to rectify the matter with Aly. The new statement follows criticism from Aly, who described the original language as racist and misogynistic. The exchange is significant not because the words have just been spoken, but because Bell has now publicly addressed them. Her expression of regret should be reported accurately without claiming that she accepted every criticism Aly made or that the parties have resolved their disagreement.

Editorial illustration of Nina Taylor and Fishermans Bend urban development

Nina Taylor Defends Fishermans Bend Plans as Rivals Demand Faster Transport

Labor MP Nina Taylor has defended the Victorian government’s approach to Fishermans Bend as rival candidates in the Albert Park electorate demanded faster public transport and better infrastructure for the growing inner-Melbourne precinct. The debate at a local election forum highlighted the gap between plans for a major urban renewal area and the transport connections residents and businesses can already use. Candidates questioned why promised tram and rail links remain distant prospects despite long-running plans to accommodate substantially more homes and jobs. Taylor pointed to recent planning steps, the Metro Tunnel and expanded bus services, while opponents pressed the government to deliver infrastructure earlier. The disagreement concerns priorities, funding and sequencing; a planning announcement should not be confused with a completed railway or tram service.

Editorial illustration of Angus Taylor and Chris Bowen with the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric project

Angus Taylor Demands Chris Bowen Resign Over Snowy 2.0 Cost Blowout

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has called for Energy Minister Chris Bowen to resign after Snowy Hydro revised the cost and completion forecast for Snowy 2.0, reviving a political argument over who is responsible for one of Australia’s most expensive energy projects. The company’s updated target is $22.2 billion, with an allowance for a cost of up to $25 billion, while commissioning is now expected in late 2029. The latest assessment is a major test for the Commonwealth-owned company and for governments of both political persuasions. Taylor was energy minister when the project was approved under the Coalition. Bowen, who oversees the project as a shareholder minister under Labor, says the early design and engineering assumptions left a lasting problem. Neither side’s political account changes the figures Australians now need to assess.

Editorial illustration of David Pocock and Anthony Albanese with parliamentary funding documents

David Pocock Challenges Albanese Over Helen Haines Funding Dossier

Independent senator David Pocock has challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s explanation of a document circulated from his office about fellow independent Helen Haines, drawing a sharp distinction between routine political briefing and material that can cast doubt on an MP’s integrity. Albanese says the file concerned Haines’s requests for funding for her electorate and was not intended as a personal attack. The row has taken on particular sensitivity after the alleged vehicle attack that left Haines critically injured. That incident is the subject of a separate criminal investigation. No established evidence links the circulation of the political document to the alleged attack or identifies political briefing as a motive. Treating the two events as causally connected would go beyond the facts.