Pauline Hanson Meets Nigel Farage at CPAC Britain as One Nation Strengthens International Conservative Links

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has used her appearance at the inaugural Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) Great Britain in London to reinforce her party’s growing ties with conservative and populist movements overseas, describing the event as an opportunity to learn from countries confronting many of the same political challenges as Australia.

During the conference, Hanson delivered one of the event’s keynote speeches before meeting Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, whom she described as a friend. According to One Nation, the pair discussed immigration, national sovereignty, economic pressures and what they see as common policy challenges facing both Australia and the United Kingdom.

Pauline Hanson meets Nigel Farage during CPAC Great Britain in London

In a statement following the meeting, Hanson said the visit had been “hugely valuable” and argued that Australia could learn lessons from countries that have already experienced many of the social and political issues now emerging domestically.

“Many countries face the same struggles we do, and there is a fightback going on across a number of countries, not just Australia,” the statement said.

It added that parties such as One Nation and Reform UK were “fighting the same fight for the same values”, reflecting an increasing willingness by both parties to publicly identify with a broader international conservative movement.

The meeting with Farage came during CPAC Great Britain, the first British edition of the influential Conservative Political Action Conference, an event that has traditionally brought together conservative politicians, activists and commentators from around the world. The London conference featured speakers from Britain, the United States, Europe and Australia, with immigration, national identity, free speech, energy policy and economic growth dominating the agenda.

Farage, who leads Reform UK, has become one of Britain’s most recognisable political figures over the past two decades. After playing a central role in the Brexit campaign, he has repositioned Reform UK as one of the country’s fastest-growing political parties, campaigning heavily on reducing immigration, lowering taxes and challenging what he describes as Britain’s political establishment.

Although Hanson and Farage have known each other for several years through international conservative conferences, their latest meeting comes at a politically significant time for both leaders.

In Australia, One Nation has enjoyed a substantial rise in opinion polling during 2026, emerging as one of the country’s strongest minor parties and increasing pressure on the Coalition across several conservative electorates.

Meanwhile, Reform UK has continued expanding its influence in British politics, positioning itself as a significant challenger to both Labour and the Conservatives.

For Hanson, the UK visit forms part of what One Nation has described as a broader fact-finding mission examining how other countries are responding to issues such as migration, border security, housing affordability and the cost of living.

However, the overseas trip has also attracted significant controversy.

Before speaking at CPAC, Hanson appeared on a podcast hosted by British political activist Tommy Robinson, where she made several remarks about immigration, multiculturalism and the former White Australia Policy that prompted criticism from political opponents and community groups in Australia. Those comments drew condemnation from Labor ministers and the Greens, while some figures within the broader conservative movement also distanced themselves from aspects of the interview.

Questions have also been raised about other parts of Hanson’s European itinerary, including a visit to Sicily and whether taxpayers contributed to any aspect of the overseas travel. Hanson has denied that Australian taxpayers funded her private travel, saying the trip “cost taxpayers not $1” and insisting she has complied with parliamentary requirements.

Despite those controversies, Hanson proceeded with her scheduled CPAC appearance, where she argued that Western democracies increasingly face similar political pressures and that conservative parties benefit from exchanging ideas internationally.

While full details of her speech have not been released publicly, reporting from the conference indicates Hanson focused heavily on immigration policy, national sovereignty and preserving cultural identity—issues that have long formed the core of One Nation’s political platform.

Farage has likewise built much of Reform UK’s electoral strategy around tighter immigration controls and criticism of Britain’s existing political establishment. Although the two parties operate in different political systems, both frequently campaign on reducing migration, opposing what they describe as excessive government intervention and promoting stronger national borders.

Those similarities have led to increasing interaction between conservative movements in Australia, Britain, Europe and the United States through events such as CPAC.

Supporters argue these conferences provide an opportunity for politicians to exchange policy ideas, discuss electoral strategies and build relationships with like-minded parties overseas.

Critics, however, argue that such gatherings can also amplify divisive political rhetoric and strengthen networks between populist movements whose approaches to immigration and multiculturalism remain highly contentious.

For One Nation, the London visit also carries domestic political significance.

The party has sought to present itself as part of a broader international movement responding to concerns over migration, inflation, housing shortages and national identity. Hanson has repeatedly argued that Australia should pay close attention to policy developments overseas rather than waiting until similar challenges become more difficult to address.

Political opponents reject that argument, saying Australia’s economic, demographic and constitutional circumstances differ substantially from those of Britain and warning against importing overseas culture-war politics into Australian public debate.

The meeting between Hanson and Farage is therefore likely to reinforce both the enthusiasm of One Nation supporters and the concerns of its critics.

As Australia’s next federal election approaches, One Nation continues positioning itself as a party willing to challenge both Labor and the Coalition while drawing inspiration from conservative movements abroad.

Whether that international strategy ultimately broadens the party’s appeal or further polarises public opinion remains to be seen. What is clear is that Hanson’s appearance at CPAC Great Britain has again placed One Nation at the centre of Australia’s ongoing debate over immigration, national identity and the influence of global conservative politics.

Related Posts

Editorial illustration of Steven Miles and David Crisafulli in Queensland politics

Steven Miles Challenges Crisafulli Over Child Safety After Amanda Camm Quits

Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles has challenged Premier David Crisafulli to appoint an experienced replacement for Amanda Camm after she announced her decision to step down from the child safety and domestic and family violence portfolios. Miles says the choice will reveal how seriously the government takes services for vulnerable children and families. Crisafulli has praised Camm’s record and defended the reforms initiated during her term. Camm says her decision was personal and followed major surgery and an incomplete recovery. She has also referred to the stress of her ministerial workload and the impact of public harassment. Her resignation should not be portrayed as an admission that the criticism of her administration was correct. The policy dispute and the reasons she has given for leaving office are separate facts.

Editorial illustration of Sharon Freund and Michael Allen with courthouse imagery, not a photograph of proceedings

Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Watchdog Referral Amid Dispute With Michael Allen

NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has taken her challenge to a watchdog referral before the Court of Appeal amid a prolonged dispute involving Local Court Chief Judge Michael Allen. The latest proceedings concern whether decisions and observations arising from a Judicial Commission process were reached and handled lawfully. The legal contest remains unresolved, and the allegations at its centre must not be treated as disciplinary findings against either judge. Published accounts of the Court of Appeal proceedings say Freund’s lawyers have challenged the Attorney-General’s referral of her conduct to the NSW Judicial Commission. The dispute has been linked to questions about the handling of a criminal case involving a judicial colleague’s adult child and to competing allegations about procedural propriety. Those accounts remain contested, and the Court of Appeal’s task is not identical to a final disciplinary inquiry.

Editorial illustration of Angie Bell and Anne Aly, Australian parliamentary debate

Angie Bell Calls Stoning Remarks ‘Regrettable’ After Anne Aly Criticism

Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell has described her earlier parliamentary remarks about Small Business Minister Anne Aly and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as regrettable, calling them a poor choice of words after a furious public dispute over violent imagery in political debate. Bell says the comment was neither helpful nor planned, and that she withdrew it and tried to rectify the matter with Aly. The new statement follows criticism from Aly, who described the original language as racist and misogynistic. The exchange is significant not because the words have just been spoken, but because Bell has now publicly addressed them. Her expression of regret should be reported accurately without claiming that she accepted every criticism Aly made or that the parties have resolved their disagreement.

Editorial illustration of Nina Taylor and Fishermans Bend urban development

Nina Taylor Defends Fishermans Bend Plans as Rivals Demand Faster Transport

Labor MP Nina Taylor has defended the Victorian government’s approach to Fishermans Bend as rival candidates in the Albert Park electorate demanded faster public transport and better infrastructure for the growing inner-Melbourne precinct. The debate at a local election forum highlighted the gap between plans for a major urban renewal area and the transport connections residents and businesses can already use. Candidates questioned why promised tram and rail links remain distant prospects despite long-running plans to accommodate substantially more homes and jobs. Taylor pointed to recent planning steps, the Metro Tunnel and expanded bus services, while opponents pressed the government to deliver infrastructure earlier. The disagreement concerns priorities, funding and sequencing; a planning announcement should not be confused with a completed railway or tram service.

Editorial illustration of Angus Taylor and Chris Bowen with the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric project

Angus Taylor Demands Chris Bowen Resign Over Snowy 2.0 Cost Blowout

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has called for Energy Minister Chris Bowen to resign after Snowy Hydro revised the cost and completion forecast for Snowy 2.0, reviving a political argument over who is responsible for one of Australia’s most expensive energy projects. The company’s updated target is $22.2 billion, with an allowance for a cost of up to $25 billion, while commissioning is now expected in late 2029. The latest assessment is a major test for the Commonwealth-owned company and for governments of both political persuasions. Taylor was energy minister when the project was approved under the Coalition. Bowen, who oversees the project as a shareholder minister under Labor, says the early design and engineering assumptions left a lasting problem. Neither side’s political account changes the figures Australians now need to assess.

Editorial illustration of David Pocock and Anthony Albanese with parliamentary funding documents

David Pocock Challenges Albanese Over Helen Haines Funding Dossier

Independent senator David Pocock has challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s explanation of a document circulated from his office about fellow independent Helen Haines, drawing a sharp distinction between routine political briefing and material that can cast doubt on an MP’s integrity. Albanese says the file concerned Haines’s requests for funding for her electorate and was not intended as a personal attack. The row has taken on particular sensitivity after the alleged vehicle attack that left Haines critically injured. That incident is the subject of a separate criminal investigation. No established evidence links the circulation of the political document to the alleged attack or identifies political briefing as a motive. Treating the two events as causally connected would go beyond the facts.