House prices are falling, but Australia’s rental pain may be about to get even worse

Australia’s housing market may finally be cooling after years of rapid price growth, but for millions of renters the outlook is becoming increasingly uncertain.

Australian rental market and housing affordability crisis

While falling property values would traditionally be expected to improve affordability, housing experts warn the opposite may occur in the rental market as investors retreat, new supply struggles to keep pace with demand and vacancy rates remain close to historic lows.

Some analysts argue Australia is not approaching a rental crisis—it is already experiencing one.

Australian Property Scout founder Sam Gordon said recent rental figures pointed to an increasingly constrained market, with rents continuing to climb despite weaker house prices.

According to Gordon, annual rents have risen by around 18 per cent in Darwin, about 10 per cent in Perth and roughly 7 per cent across Sydney and Brisbane over the past year.

National vacancy rates remain around 1.2 per cent, significantly below the roughly 3 per cent level generally regarded as representing a balanced rental market.

“We’re not heading towards a rental crisis, we’re already in one,” Gordon said.

He argues Australia entered the latest period with an existing shortage of rental accommodation, leaving the market particularly vulnerable to any further reduction in investor activity.

The concern comes as higher interest rates continue to increase borrowing costs while changes announced in the federal budget have altered the investment landscape for residential property.

From July 2027, negative gearing concessions for newly purchased established homes will be significantly restricted, while capital gains tax arrangements will also change. Existing investments retain grandfathering protections, but many analysts believe the reforms are already influencing investor decisions.

For many investors, the combination of softer capital growth, elevated mortgage costs and changing tax treatment has reduced the appeal of purchasing existing rental properties.

Several major banks now forecast further declines in house prices extending into 2027, particularly across Sydney and Melbourne, although expectations differ between institutions and regions.

At first glance, lower property prices might appear to benefit renters by making home ownership more achievable.

However, economists caution that Australia’s housing market is driven by two related but distinct forces: owner-occupier demand and rental supply.

If fewer investors purchase rental properties while population growth remains strong, the number of homes available to rent may fail to keep pace with demand, pushing rents even higher despite falling purchase prices.

Industry groups have repeatedly warned that Australia’s underlying housing shortage remains the central challenge.

Evidence presented to a parliamentary inquiry this year suggested rental affordability is unlikely to improve substantially unless housing supply increases meaningfully over an extended period. The Urban Development Institute of Australia noted vacancy rates remain well below historical averages and forecast that affordability pressures could worsen without additional rental construction.

National Australia Bank has also highlighted the continuing imbalance between housing construction and demand.

Although dwelling commencements have improved in recent years, completions continue to lag while a large pipeline of projects remains under construction, limiting the speed at which additional homes become available.

The Reserve Bank has similarly observed that many property investors rely on expectations of future capital growth to offset short-term losses associated with interest costs and property expenses.

When those expectations weaken, some investors become more cautious or reconsider expanding their portfolios, particularly during periods of higher borrowing costs.

That behavioural shift is becoming increasingly visible across parts of the country.

Recent market commentary suggests investors are increasingly focusing on newly built housing, where tax incentives remain available, rather than purchasing existing dwellings that have traditionally supplied much of Australia’s rental stock.

Some property investors remain optimistic despite the changing conditions.

Gordon himself has publicly argued that falling prices may create buying opportunities in selected regional markets where rental demand remains strong, although he has cautioned against assuming every city will perform equally.

The market has become increasingly fragmented.

While Sydney and Melbourne have recorded declining dwelling values, cities including Perth and Adelaide have generally maintained stronger price performance, even as momentum slows.

Rental markets, however, remain tight across much of the country, particularly in capitals where vacancy rates remain below one per cent.

For renters, these conditions are translating into continued competition for available properties.

Open inspections frequently attract dozens of applicants, while many households are committing a growing share of their income to housing costs.

Housing affordability advocates warn prolonged rent growth disproportionately affects lower-income households, younger Australians and essential workers who already face significant barriers to entering the property market.

The federal government has argued that its housing reforms are designed to encourage additional construction, improve long-term affordability and increase opportunities for first-home buyers.

Supporters believe redirecting investor demand towards new housing should eventually boost supply and moderate price pressures.

Critics counter that the transition period may prove difficult, particularly if new construction fails to offset reduced investment in existing rental properties quickly enough.

Treasury has previously estimated only modest effects on average rents from the reforms, but acknowledged housing supply will remain a critical factor determining future affordability outcomes.

The broader economic environment also remains uncertain.

Higher interest rates continue to affect household budgets, while construction costs, labour shortages and planning constraints have limited the pace of new housing delivery in many parts of Australia.

These structural challenges have existed for several years and are unlikely to be resolved quickly.

As a result, many housing analysts believe rental pressures are likely to remain elevated even if property values continue to soften.

For tenants hoping that declining house prices would finally ease the cost-of-living squeeze, the reality may be more complicated.

Cheaper homes do not automatically translate into cheaper rents when the number of available rental properties remains critically low.

Until housing supply expands sufficiently to meet demand, Australia’s rental market is expected to remain one of the country’s most significant economic and social challenges.

Related Posts

Editorial illustration of Steven Miles and David Crisafulli in Queensland politics

Steven Miles Challenges Crisafulli Over Child Safety After Amanda Camm Quits

Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles has challenged Premier David Crisafulli to appoint an experienced replacement for Amanda Camm after she announced her decision to step down from the child safety and domestic and family violence portfolios. Miles says the choice will reveal how seriously the government takes services for vulnerable children and families. Crisafulli has praised Camm’s record and defended the reforms initiated during her term. Camm says her decision was personal and followed major surgery and an incomplete recovery. She has also referred to the stress of her ministerial workload and the impact of public harassment. Her resignation should not be portrayed as an admission that the criticism of her administration was correct. The policy dispute and the reasons she has given for leaving office are separate facts.

Editorial illustration of Sharon Freund and Michael Allen with courthouse imagery, not a photograph of proceedings

Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Watchdog Referral Amid Dispute With Michael Allen

NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has taken her challenge to a watchdog referral before the Court of Appeal amid a prolonged dispute involving Local Court Chief Judge Michael Allen. The latest proceedings concern whether decisions and observations arising from a Judicial Commission process were reached and handled lawfully. The legal contest remains unresolved, and the allegations at its centre must not be treated as disciplinary findings against either judge. Published accounts of the Court of Appeal proceedings say Freund’s lawyers have challenged the Attorney-General’s referral of her conduct to the NSW Judicial Commission. The dispute has been linked to questions about the handling of a criminal case involving a judicial colleague’s adult child and to competing allegations about procedural propriety. Those accounts remain contested, and the Court of Appeal’s task is not identical to a final disciplinary inquiry.

Editorial illustration of Angie Bell and Anne Aly, Australian parliamentary debate

Angie Bell Calls Stoning Remarks ‘Regrettable’ After Anne Aly Criticism

Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell has described her earlier parliamentary remarks about Small Business Minister Anne Aly and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as regrettable, calling them a poor choice of words after a furious public dispute over violent imagery in political debate. Bell says the comment was neither helpful nor planned, and that she withdrew it and tried to rectify the matter with Aly. The new statement follows criticism from Aly, who described the original language as racist and misogynistic. The exchange is significant not because the words have just been spoken, but because Bell has now publicly addressed them. Her expression of regret should be reported accurately without claiming that she accepted every criticism Aly made or that the parties have resolved their disagreement.

Editorial illustration of Nina Taylor and Fishermans Bend urban development

Nina Taylor Defends Fishermans Bend Plans as Rivals Demand Faster Transport

Labor MP Nina Taylor has defended the Victorian government’s approach to Fishermans Bend as rival candidates in the Albert Park electorate demanded faster public transport and better infrastructure for the growing inner-Melbourne precinct. The debate at a local election forum highlighted the gap between plans for a major urban renewal area and the transport connections residents and businesses can already use. Candidates questioned why promised tram and rail links remain distant prospects despite long-running plans to accommodate substantially more homes and jobs. Taylor pointed to recent planning steps, the Metro Tunnel and expanded bus services, while opponents pressed the government to deliver infrastructure earlier. The disagreement concerns priorities, funding and sequencing; a planning announcement should not be confused with a completed railway or tram service.

Editorial illustration of Angus Taylor and Chris Bowen with the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric project

Angus Taylor Demands Chris Bowen Resign Over Snowy 2.0 Cost Blowout

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has called for Energy Minister Chris Bowen to resign after Snowy Hydro revised the cost and completion forecast for Snowy 2.0, reviving a political argument over who is responsible for one of Australia’s most expensive energy projects. The company’s updated target is $22.2 billion, with an allowance for a cost of up to $25 billion, while commissioning is now expected in late 2029. The latest assessment is a major test for the Commonwealth-owned company and for governments of both political persuasions. Taylor was energy minister when the project was approved under the Coalition. Bowen, who oversees the project as a shareholder minister under Labor, says the early design and engineering assumptions left a lasting problem. Neither side’s political account changes the figures Australians now need to assess.

Editorial illustration of David Pocock and Anthony Albanese with parliamentary funding documents

David Pocock Challenges Albanese Over Helen Haines Funding Dossier

Independent senator David Pocock has challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s explanation of a document circulated from his office about fellow independent Helen Haines, drawing a sharp distinction between routine political briefing and material that can cast doubt on an MP’s integrity. Albanese says the file concerned Haines’s requests for funding for her electorate and was not intended as a personal attack. The row has taken on particular sensitivity after the alleged vehicle attack that left Haines critically injured. That incident is the subject of a separate criminal investigation. No established evidence links the circulation of the political document to the alleged attack or identifies political briefing as a motive. Treating the two events as causally connected would go beyond the facts.