Australians urged to check super accounts as ASIC warns retirement savings can be wiped out by excessive fees

Australians are being urged to closely examine their superannuation accounts after the nation’s corporate regulator uncovered alarming cases in which retirement savings were almost entirely wiped out by excessive advice fees, inappropriate charges and poor oversight by superannuation trustees.

Australians urged to review their superannuation accounts following ASIC warning

The warning comes from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), which says some trustees responsible for overseeing members’ retirement savings are failing to identify harmful fee arrangements, unusual account activity and risky switching between investment products before significant financial damage occurs.

ASIC Commissioner Simone Constant said every trustee should urgently review its monitoring systems to ensure members are adequately protected.

“All superannuation trustees should immediately review and consider areas for improvement before risks translate to serious harms for Australians and their hard-earned retirement savings,” Commissioner Constant said.

The regulator’s concerns are outlined in its 29-page report, Safeguarding super: How well are platform trustees monitoring risks to retirement savings (Report 833), which examined six major platform trustees responsible for more than $300 billion in retirement savings—around three-quarters of all funds held through Australia’s superannuation platforms.

Among the most disturbing findings was a case in which one member’s retirement savings were almost completely eroded by inappropriate fees that were not detected by the trustee responsible for safeguarding the account.

ASIC also identified another advice model where affected members lost, on average, around half of their superannuation balances through fees before trustees intervened.

Commissioner Constant described those outcomes as evidence that some trustees had failed to provide even basic protections for their members.

The report found several trustees appeared more focused on maintaining commercial relationships with financial advisers than identifying practices that could severely reduce members’ retirement balances.

ASIC also expressed concern over the size of fee caps permitted by some trustees.

One trustee proposed allowing advice fees of up to $30,000, while another maintained a cap of $25,000. Three trustees had no upper dollar limit on certain percentage-based fees, creating the potential for very large deductions from member accounts.

The warning follows the high-profile collapses of the Shield Master Fund and First Guardian Master Fund, which ASIC says resulted in more than 11,000 Australians collectively losing around $1 billion in retirement savings.

Investigations into those schemes found many investors had been encouraged to transfer their existing superannuation into higher-risk investment structures through financial advisers and lead-generation businesses. ASIC alleges weaknesses in trustee oversight allowed significant losses to occur before intervention.

Both collapses remain the subject of extensive regulatory action.

ASIC has launched multiple civil proceedings against trustees and financial services firms connected with the funds, while separate investigations continue into advisers, responsible entities, lead generators and other participants involved in the schemes.

The regulator says recent failures demonstrate why trustees must actively monitor unusual investment patterns rather than relying solely on advisers or platform providers.

Report 833 found shortcomings including:

  • Limited reviews of financial advice documents before significant fees were deducted.
  • Inadequate monitoring of unusually high advice charges.
  • Poor detection of rapid switching into high-risk investments.
  • Insufficient assessment of advisers’ business models before allowing them onto investment platforms.
  • Weak monitoring of unusual fund flows and member churn.

ASIC warned these weaknesses create opportunities for inappropriate advice fees, harmful investment switching and other practices capable of substantially reducing retirement balances before problems are detected.

Commissioner Constant said Australia’s superannuation system has become too important to treat passively.

She encouraged Australians to monitor their retirement savings in much the same way they regularly review their bank accounts.

“Engage with your super as you do with your banks,” she urged, adding that members should expect appropriate protections, services and oversight from those entrusted with managing their retirement savings.

Australia’s compulsory superannuation system is one of the largest retirement savings systems in the world.

ASIC estimates the nation’s platform superannuation sector now manages almost $400 billion in member benefits, while annual advice fees charged through those platforms have grown to approximately $2.3 billion after increasing fourfold over the past decade.

The broader Australian superannuation system now holds assets worth more than $4.5 trillion, making effective oversight increasingly significant not only for individual retirees but also for the country’s financial system.

Commissioner Constant said that scale makes trustee accountability more important than ever.

“The four-and-a-half trillion dollar superannuation sector is a great asset for Australia and a great asset for Australians. But in order to be that great asset, it needs to be done well,” she said.

ASIC has made clear that trustees should expect much closer scrutiny going forward.

The regulator said it intends to deepen its investigations, become more transparent about naming poor practices and pursue enforcement action where significant failures are identified.

The warning follows a series of legal actions already taken against trustees connected to the Shield and First Guardian matters, with ASIC seeking compensation for affected members as well as civil penalties where appropriate.

Financial experts generally recommend that Australians review their superannuation statements regularly, confirm that advice fees match services actually received, question unexpected deductions, and contact both their super fund and ASIC if they notice unusual transactions or investment switches they do not recognise.

Members should also be cautious of unsolicited phone calls, social media advertisements or lead-generation businesses encouraging them to transfer retirement savings into unfamiliar investment products. ASIC has repeatedly warned that these marketing channels featured prominently in several recent superannuation scandals.

While the overwhelming majority of Australians continue to build retirement savings through legitimate superannuation funds, ASIC says recent events demonstrate that strong trustee oversight remains essential to protecting members from excessive fees, conflicted advice and investment practices capable of eroding years of retirement savings.

For millions of Australians, superannuation represents their largest financial asset outside the family home. ASIC’s latest warning is a reminder that regularly checking account balances, reviewing fee deductions and questioning unexpected changes may help identify problems before they become irreversible.

Related Posts

Editorial illustration of Steven Miles and David Crisafulli in Queensland politics

Steven Miles Challenges Crisafulli Over Child Safety After Amanda Camm Quits

Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles has challenged Premier David Crisafulli to appoint an experienced replacement for Amanda Camm after she announced her decision to step down from the child safety and domestic and family violence portfolios. Miles says the choice will reveal how seriously the government takes services for vulnerable children and families. Crisafulli has praised Camm’s record and defended the reforms initiated during her term. Camm says her decision was personal and followed major surgery and an incomplete recovery. She has also referred to the stress of her ministerial workload and the impact of public harassment. Her resignation should not be portrayed as an admission that the criticism of her administration was correct. The policy dispute and the reasons she has given for leaving office are separate facts.

Editorial illustration of Sharon Freund and Michael Allen with courthouse imagery, not a photograph of proceedings

Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Watchdog Referral Amid Dispute With Michael Allen

NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has taken her challenge to a watchdog referral before the Court of Appeal amid a prolonged dispute involving Local Court Chief Judge Michael Allen. The latest proceedings concern whether decisions and observations arising from a Judicial Commission process were reached and handled lawfully. The legal contest remains unresolved, and the allegations at its centre must not be treated as disciplinary findings against either judge. Published accounts of the Court of Appeal proceedings say Freund’s lawyers have challenged the Attorney-General’s referral of her conduct to the NSW Judicial Commission. The dispute has been linked to questions about the handling of a criminal case involving a judicial colleague’s adult child and to competing allegations about procedural propriety. Those accounts remain contested, and the Court of Appeal’s task is not identical to a final disciplinary inquiry.

Editorial illustration of Angie Bell and Anne Aly, Australian parliamentary debate

Angie Bell Calls Stoning Remarks ‘Regrettable’ After Anne Aly Criticism

Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell has described her earlier parliamentary remarks about Small Business Minister Anne Aly and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as regrettable, calling them a poor choice of words after a furious public dispute over violent imagery in political debate. Bell says the comment was neither helpful nor planned, and that she withdrew it and tried to rectify the matter with Aly. The new statement follows criticism from Aly, who described the original language as racist and misogynistic. The exchange is significant not because the words have just been spoken, but because Bell has now publicly addressed them. Her expression of regret should be reported accurately without claiming that she accepted every criticism Aly made or that the parties have resolved their disagreement.

Editorial illustration of Nina Taylor and Fishermans Bend urban development

Nina Taylor Defends Fishermans Bend Plans as Rivals Demand Faster Transport

Labor MP Nina Taylor has defended the Victorian government’s approach to Fishermans Bend as rival candidates in the Albert Park electorate demanded faster public transport and better infrastructure for the growing inner-Melbourne precinct. The debate at a local election forum highlighted the gap between plans for a major urban renewal area and the transport connections residents and businesses can already use. Candidates questioned why promised tram and rail links remain distant prospects despite long-running plans to accommodate substantially more homes and jobs. Taylor pointed to recent planning steps, the Metro Tunnel and expanded bus services, while opponents pressed the government to deliver infrastructure earlier. The disagreement concerns priorities, funding and sequencing; a planning announcement should not be confused with a completed railway or tram service.

Editorial illustration of Angus Taylor and Chris Bowen with the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric project

Angus Taylor Demands Chris Bowen Resign Over Snowy 2.0 Cost Blowout

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has called for Energy Minister Chris Bowen to resign after Snowy Hydro revised the cost and completion forecast for Snowy 2.0, reviving a political argument over who is responsible for one of Australia’s most expensive energy projects. The company’s updated target is $22.2 billion, with an allowance for a cost of up to $25 billion, while commissioning is now expected in late 2029. The latest assessment is a major test for the Commonwealth-owned company and for governments of both political persuasions. Taylor was energy minister when the project was approved under the Coalition. Bowen, who oversees the project as a shareholder minister under Labor, says the early design and engineering assumptions left a lasting problem. Neither side’s political account changes the figures Australians now need to assess.

Editorial illustration of David Pocock and Anthony Albanese with parliamentary funding documents

David Pocock Challenges Albanese Over Helen Haines Funding Dossier

Independent senator David Pocock has challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s explanation of a document circulated from his office about fellow independent Helen Haines, drawing a sharp distinction between routine political briefing and material that can cast doubt on an MP’s integrity. Albanese says the file concerned Haines’s requests for funding for her electorate and was not intended as a personal attack. The row has taken on particular sensitivity after the alleged vehicle attack that left Haines critically injured. That incident is the subject of a separate criminal investigation. No established evidence links the circulation of the political document to the alleged attack or identifies political briefing as a motive. Treating the two events as causally connected would go beyond the facts.