One Nation hails Victoria poll as Labor stumbles and pressure mounts on Jacinta Allan

Pauline Hanson’s One Nation has seized on a new Victorian opinion poll showing the party leading the state’s primary vote, claiming the result reflects growing frustration with both the Labor Government and the traditional opposition ahead of the next state election.

In a statement released after the poll became public, One Nation described the findings as evidence that Victorians are increasingly looking beyond the state’s two major political parties.

“Interesting poll in Victoria! It has us out in front,” the party said.

One Nation also highlighted the polling of Premier Jacinta Allan, arguing that the Labor leader has become one of the least popular premiers in modern Victorian political history.

Victoria opinion poll shows One Nation leading primary vote

The party further criticised the Victorian Liberals, saying that while Labor’s support has continued to weaken, the opposition has spent too much time dealing with internal political disputes instead of presenting itself as a government-in-waiting.

“A lot of work is currently taking place behind the scenes to ensure we have the team and the policies to deliver the change Victorians need and deserve,” the statement said.

The comments follow a large RedBridge survey of approximately 6,500 Victorian voters which placed One Nation on 27 per cent of the primary vote, narrowly ahead of both Labor and the Coalition, which each recorded 26 per cent. The Greens were on 12 per cent, with other parties accounting for the remaining support.

The findings represented a remarkable shift in Victorian politics, where One Nation has historically struggled to achieve the same level of electoral success enjoyed in parts of Queensland and regional New South Wales.

Political analysts caution, however, that a strong primary vote does not automatically translate into government under Australia’s preferential voting system.

Preference flows, local candidate strength and electorate-by-electorate contests all play a decisive role in determining who ultimately wins seats in the Legislative Assembly.

Even so, the polling has intensified debate over the direction of Victorian politics as both major parties confront growing voter dissatisfaction.

Premier Jacinta Allan continues to face mounting pressure following a series of controversies affecting her government.

Recent political debate has focused on integrity issues surrounding the construction sector, questions about oversight of major infrastructure projects, housing affordability and persistent cost-of-living pressures.

The RedBridge polling has reportedly fuelled concern within Labor ranks that the government could suffer a significant electoral setback if current trends continue.

Labor has rejected claims that polling alone reflects the likely election outcome, arguing voters will ultimately judge the government on its record in health, education, transport and economic management.

The Allan Government has continued to highlight investment in hospitals, schools and infrastructure while defending its approach to managing Victoria’s finances after years of major capital spending.

Meanwhile, the Liberal Party has also faced scrutiny over its own ability to capitalise on Labor’s declining popularity.

Internal disagreements, leadership challenges and questions about policy direction have prompted criticism from political observers who argue the opposition has not yet fully convinced voters it is ready to govern.

One Nation has attempted to use that political vacuum to position itself as an alternative for voters dissatisfied with both major parties.

The party continues to campaign heavily on issues including cost-of-living pressures, housing affordability, immigration, crime, energy prices and government accountability.

According to One Nation, many Victorians believe the existing political establishment has failed to address everyday concerns affecting households and small businesses.

Supporters argue the latest polling demonstrates increasing public willingness to consider alternatives outside the traditional Labor-Coalition contest.

Critics, however, question whether One Nation can convert polling support into enough lower-house victories to exercise significant influence over the next Victorian Parliament.

Electoral experts note that Victoria’s geographic voting patterns differ substantially from Queensland, where One Nation has historically achieved stronger results.

Urban Melbourne remains considerably more competitive for the Greens and the major parties, while One Nation’s strongest opportunities are generally expected to come from regional and outer suburban electorates where concerns about housing, infrastructure and living costs are particularly acute.

The RedBridge poll nevertheless highlights increasing fragmentation within Victorian politics.

Instead of two dominant parties competing for government, voters appear increasingly willing to support smaller parties and independents, creating greater uncertainty over future election outcomes.

That fragmentation could make preference negotiations more important than ever before, particularly if neither Labor nor the Coalition secures a clear parliamentary majority.

For Labor, the challenge will be rebuilding confidence among voters concerned about affordability, public services and integrity in government.

For the Liberals, the task is convincing Victorians they offer a credible alternative administration capable of replacing Labor after more than a decade in office.

For One Nation, maintaining recent polling momentum while translating statewide support into individual seat victories will be the critical test.

Although opinion polls provide only a snapshot of public sentiment rather than a prediction of election results, the latest Victorian survey has intensified political debate and reinforced the increasingly competitive nature of the state’s political landscape.

As campaigning gathers pace, housing affordability, cost-of-living pressures, infrastructure spending and confidence in political leadership are expected to remain central issues shaping the contest for government.

Related Posts

Editorial illustration of Steven Miles and David Crisafulli in Queensland politics

Steven Miles Challenges Crisafulli Over Child Safety After Amanda Camm Quits

Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles has challenged Premier David Crisafulli to appoint an experienced replacement for Amanda Camm after she announced her decision to step down from the child safety and domestic and family violence portfolios. Miles says the choice will reveal how seriously the government takes services for vulnerable children and families. Crisafulli has praised Camm’s record and defended the reforms initiated during her term. Camm says her decision was personal and followed major surgery and an incomplete recovery. She has also referred to the stress of her ministerial workload and the impact of public harassment. Her resignation should not be portrayed as an admission that the criticism of her administration was correct. The policy dispute and the reasons she has given for leaving office are separate facts.

Editorial illustration of Sharon Freund and Michael Allen with courthouse imagery, not a photograph of proceedings

Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Watchdog Referral Amid Dispute With Michael Allen

NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has taken her challenge to a watchdog referral before the Court of Appeal amid a prolonged dispute involving Local Court Chief Judge Michael Allen. The latest proceedings concern whether decisions and observations arising from a Judicial Commission process were reached and handled lawfully. The legal contest remains unresolved, and the allegations at its centre must not be treated as disciplinary findings against either judge. Published accounts of the Court of Appeal proceedings say Freund’s lawyers have challenged the Attorney-General’s referral of her conduct to the NSW Judicial Commission. The dispute has been linked to questions about the handling of a criminal case involving a judicial colleague’s adult child and to competing allegations about procedural propriety. Those accounts remain contested, and the Court of Appeal’s task is not identical to a final disciplinary inquiry.

Editorial illustration of Angie Bell and Anne Aly, Australian parliamentary debate

Angie Bell Calls Stoning Remarks ‘Regrettable’ After Anne Aly Criticism

Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell has described her earlier parliamentary remarks about Small Business Minister Anne Aly and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as regrettable, calling them a poor choice of words after a furious public dispute over violent imagery in political debate. Bell says the comment was neither helpful nor planned, and that she withdrew it and tried to rectify the matter with Aly. The new statement follows criticism from Aly, who described the original language as racist and misogynistic. The exchange is significant not because the words have just been spoken, but because Bell has now publicly addressed them. Her expression of regret should be reported accurately without claiming that she accepted every criticism Aly made or that the parties have resolved their disagreement.

Editorial illustration of Nina Taylor and Fishermans Bend urban development

Nina Taylor Defends Fishermans Bend Plans as Rivals Demand Faster Transport

Labor MP Nina Taylor has defended the Victorian government’s approach to Fishermans Bend as rival candidates in the Albert Park electorate demanded faster public transport and better infrastructure for the growing inner-Melbourne precinct. The debate at a local election forum highlighted the gap between plans for a major urban renewal area and the transport connections residents and businesses can already use. Candidates questioned why promised tram and rail links remain distant prospects despite long-running plans to accommodate substantially more homes and jobs. Taylor pointed to recent planning steps, the Metro Tunnel and expanded bus services, while opponents pressed the government to deliver infrastructure earlier. The disagreement concerns priorities, funding and sequencing; a planning announcement should not be confused with a completed railway or tram service.

Editorial illustration of Angus Taylor and Chris Bowen with the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric project

Angus Taylor Demands Chris Bowen Resign Over Snowy 2.0 Cost Blowout

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has called for Energy Minister Chris Bowen to resign after Snowy Hydro revised the cost and completion forecast for Snowy 2.0, reviving a political argument over who is responsible for one of Australia’s most expensive energy projects. The company’s updated target is $22.2 billion, with an allowance for a cost of up to $25 billion, while commissioning is now expected in late 2029. The latest assessment is a major test for the Commonwealth-owned company and for governments of both political persuasions. Taylor was energy minister when the project was approved under the Coalition. Bowen, who oversees the project as a shareholder minister under Labor, says the early design and engineering assumptions left a lasting problem. Neither side’s political account changes the figures Australians now need to assess.

Editorial illustration of David Pocock and Anthony Albanese with parliamentary funding documents

David Pocock Challenges Albanese Over Helen Haines Funding Dossier

Independent senator David Pocock has challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s explanation of a document circulated from his office about fellow independent Helen Haines, drawing a sharp distinction between routine political briefing and material that can cast doubt on an MP’s integrity. Albanese says the file concerned Haines’s requests for funding for her electorate and was not intended as a personal attack. The row has taken on particular sensitivity after the alleged vehicle attack that left Haines critically injured. That incident is the subject of a separate criminal investigation. No established evidence links the circulation of the political document to the alleged attack or identifies political briefing as a motive. Treating the two events as causally connected would go beyond the facts.