Victoria Police To Replace Personal-Issue Firearms With Station-Based Armoury System

Victoria Police is preparing one of the most significant changes to its operational equipment in years, with uniformed officers set to transition from individually assigned service pistols to a station-based firearm system by the end of 2026.

The change forms part of a broader equipment replacement program as the force phases out its current standard-issue Smith & Wesson M&P40 pistols, which are no longer being manufactured. Rather than assigning each officer a permanent firearm, the new model will see weapons securely stored at police stations and issued at the beginning of each shift before being returned when duties are complete.

Victoria Police says the transition is intended to improve operational efficiency while supporting the rollout of a new generation of service pistols. Under the station-based system, officers transferring between workplaces will no longer need to move personally assigned firearms, reducing administrative processes and simplifying equipment management. Police also note that similar arrangements already exist for other operational equipment, including Tasers.

The organisation has stressed that the current firearms remain safe for operational use while the transition takes place. Although production of the existing pistol has ended, spare parts will continue to be supplied to maintain reliability until every station receives the replacement firearms. Officials say the rollout has already begun and will continue progressively across Victoria before becoming standard practice statewide by the end of 2026.

Victoria Police introduces station-based firearm system

Despite the planned changes, not all officers are convinced the new approach is the best option. Some members, particularly those working in regional areas, have expressed concern about sharing equipment that requires careful maintenance and regular inspection. Several officers told local media they worry that different handling standards between users could affect confidence in equipment that may be needed during high-risk situations. Victoria Police says a formal risk assessment concluded the change is operationally “risk neutral” and that consultation was undertaken with the Police Association Victoria, frontline officers and workplace health and safety representatives before implementation.

The firearm changes are occurring alongside broader upgrades to operational capability. Chief Commissioner Mike Bush recently announced that officers in Victoria’s Alpine region will also receive access to long-arm rifles similar to those used by specialist police units. The decision follows the fatal 2025 shooting of two police officers during the Dezi Freeman incident and is intended to provide additional protection for officers responding to high-risk situations in regional areas. Those rifles will likewise be stored securely at police stations and deployed through a shared armoury system.

Supporters of the station-based model argue that many police organisations already manage specialised equipment through central armouries rather than permanent personal allocation. They believe the approach simplifies inventory management, improves standardisation and allows replacement equipment to be distributed more efficiently when officers relocate or new firearms are introduced.

Others believe confidence in operational equipment is just as important as administrative efficiency. Police work often involves rapidly evolving situations where officers rely heavily on familiar equipment. For that reason, some serving members have suggested that regular maintenance standards, inspection procedures and accountability systems will be essential if the new model is to operate successfully.

Victoria Police has indicated that safety remains the priority throughout the transition and that existing firearms will continue to be maintained until they are fully retired. Officers will also receive training on the replacement weapons before they become operational, ensuring consistency in handling and qualification across the force.

As the statewide rollout continues over the coming months, the new armoury system is expected to become a significant operational change for Victoria Police. Whether the model ultimately delivers the efficiencies anticipated by the organisation while addressing concerns raised by some frontline officers will become clearer once implementation is complete across all stations.

Related Posts

Editorial illustration of Steven Miles and David Crisafulli in Queensland politics

Steven Miles Challenges Crisafulli Over Child Safety After Amanda Camm Quits

Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles has challenged Premier David Crisafulli to appoint an experienced replacement for Amanda Camm after she announced her decision to step down from the child safety and domestic and family violence portfolios. Miles says the choice will reveal how seriously the government takes services for vulnerable children and families. Crisafulli has praised Camm’s record and defended the reforms initiated during her term. Camm says her decision was personal and followed major surgery and an incomplete recovery. She has also referred to the stress of her ministerial workload and the impact of public harassment. Her resignation should not be portrayed as an admission that the criticism of her administration was correct. The policy dispute and the reasons she has given for leaving office are separate facts.

Editorial illustration of Sharon Freund and Michael Allen with courthouse imagery, not a photograph of proceedings

Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Watchdog Referral Amid Dispute With Michael Allen

NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has taken her challenge to a watchdog referral before the Court of Appeal amid a prolonged dispute involving Local Court Chief Judge Michael Allen. The latest proceedings concern whether decisions and observations arising from a Judicial Commission process were reached and handled lawfully. The legal contest remains unresolved, and the allegations at its centre must not be treated as disciplinary findings against either judge. Published accounts of the Court of Appeal proceedings say Freund’s lawyers have challenged the Attorney-General’s referral of her conduct to the NSW Judicial Commission. The dispute has been linked to questions about the handling of a criminal case involving a judicial colleague’s adult child and to competing allegations about procedural propriety. Those accounts remain contested, and the Court of Appeal’s task is not identical to a final disciplinary inquiry.

Editorial illustration of Angie Bell and Anne Aly, Australian parliamentary debate

Angie Bell Calls Stoning Remarks ‘Regrettable’ After Anne Aly Criticism

Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell has described her earlier parliamentary remarks about Small Business Minister Anne Aly and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as regrettable, calling them a poor choice of words after a furious public dispute over violent imagery in political debate. Bell says the comment was neither helpful nor planned, and that she withdrew it and tried to rectify the matter with Aly. The new statement follows criticism from Aly, who described the original language as racist and misogynistic. The exchange is significant not because the words have just been spoken, but because Bell has now publicly addressed them. Her expression of regret should be reported accurately without claiming that she accepted every criticism Aly made or that the parties have resolved their disagreement.

Editorial illustration of Nina Taylor and Fishermans Bend urban development

Nina Taylor Defends Fishermans Bend Plans as Rivals Demand Faster Transport

Labor MP Nina Taylor has defended the Victorian government’s approach to Fishermans Bend as rival candidates in the Albert Park electorate demanded faster public transport and better infrastructure for the growing inner-Melbourne precinct. The debate at a local election forum highlighted the gap between plans for a major urban renewal area and the transport connections residents and businesses can already use. Candidates questioned why promised tram and rail links remain distant prospects despite long-running plans to accommodate substantially more homes and jobs. Taylor pointed to recent planning steps, the Metro Tunnel and expanded bus services, while opponents pressed the government to deliver infrastructure earlier. The disagreement concerns priorities, funding and sequencing; a planning announcement should not be confused with a completed railway or tram service.

Editorial illustration of Angus Taylor and Chris Bowen with the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric project

Angus Taylor Demands Chris Bowen Resign Over Snowy 2.0 Cost Blowout

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has called for Energy Minister Chris Bowen to resign after Snowy Hydro revised the cost and completion forecast for Snowy 2.0, reviving a political argument over who is responsible for one of Australia’s most expensive energy projects. The company’s updated target is $22.2 billion, with an allowance for a cost of up to $25 billion, while commissioning is now expected in late 2029. The latest assessment is a major test for the Commonwealth-owned company and for governments of both political persuasions. Taylor was energy minister when the project was approved under the Coalition. Bowen, who oversees the project as a shareholder minister under Labor, says the early design and engineering assumptions left a lasting problem. Neither side’s political account changes the figures Australians now need to assess.

Editorial illustration of David Pocock and Anthony Albanese with parliamentary funding documents

David Pocock Challenges Albanese Over Helen Haines Funding Dossier

Independent senator David Pocock has challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s explanation of a document circulated from his office about fellow independent Helen Haines, drawing a sharp distinction between routine political briefing and material that can cast doubt on an MP’s integrity. Albanese says the file concerned Haines’s requests for funding for her electorate and was not intended as a personal attack. The row has taken on particular sensitivity after the alleged vehicle attack that left Haines critically injured. That incident is the subject of a separate criminal investigation. No established evidence links the circulation of the political document to the alleged attack or identifies political briefing as a motive. Treating the two events as causally connected would go beyond the facts.