One Nation Pledges Manufacturing Revival by Slashing Energy Costs and Rebuilding Australian Industry

Pauline Hanson’s One Nation has unveiled a renewed pitch to revive Australian manufacturing, arguing that affordable and reliable energy is the essential ingredient for restoring industrial strength, creating high-paying jobs and rebuilding the nation’s economic prosperity.

Australian manufacturing and heavy industry highlighted in One Nation's proposal to rebuild domestic production through lower energy costs

In a policy statement released by the party, One Nation says Australia’s prosperity was once built on a strong manufacturing sector that produced everything from motor vehicles and steel to household appliances, aircraft, machinery, chemicals and textiles.

The party argues that these industries not only generated exports and economic growth but also created stable, well-paid jobs that allowed many Australians to buy a family home on a single income.

“Manufacturing used to be the heart and soul of our economy,” the policy states, claiming Australia became wealthy and internationally influential because it made products domestically rather than relying heavily on imports.

One Nation says reversing the long-term decline in manufacturing would become a priority under a future One Nation government, with energy reform sitting at the centre of that strategy.

The party contends that soaring electricity and gas prices have steadily eroded Australia’s international competitiveness, making it increasingly difficult for energy-intensive industries to remain profitable or justify investing in new domestic production facilities.

According to One Nation, businesses require predictable and affordable electricity prices before they can confidently expand factories, purchase new equipment or hire additional workers. The party says reducing power costs would encourage manufacturers to increase local production instead of shifting investment offshore.

Energy policy has become one of the defining themes of One Nation’s broader economic platform in recent months.

The party has proposed ending Australia’s net zero emissions framework, expanding domestic coal, gas and oil production, streamlining approvals for new energy developments and reshaping electricity market rules with the stated goal of lowering household and industrial power bills by at least 20 per cent.

One Nation argues that manufacturing competitiveness cannot be restored while Australian businesses face significantly higher energy costs than many international competitors.

The party maintains that industries such as steelmaking, aluminium smelting, fertiliser production, chemical manufacturing and heavy engineering require continuous, affordable electricity supplies that cannot tolerate prolonged price volatility.

Alongside its broader electricity reforms, One Nation has also proposed major changes to Australia’s oil and gas sector.

Its policy includes encouraging new exploration, replacing the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax with an alternative royalty model, creating a government-backed investment vehicle to hold equity in new offshore projects and directing part of future production towards domestic industries before exports where appropriate.

The party argues these measures would strengthen Australia’s energy security while ensuring more of the financial benefits from resource development remain within the country.

Manufacturing has long been regarded as a strategic component of Australia’s economy, providing skilled employment, supporting regional communities and contributing to national resilience through domestic production capability.

However, the sector’s share of Australia’s economy has steadily declined over recent decades as globalisation, lower overseas labour costs, technological change and shifting investment patterns reshaped industrial production.

Many major manufacturing operations, including vehicle assembly plants, progressively closed during the past two decades, leaving Australia without mass domestic car manufacturing after the final local assembly lines shut in 2017.

Supporters of industrial policy argue that rebuilding advanced manufacturing could improve economic resilience, diversify exports and reduce reliance on overseas supply chains that were exposed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Successive governments have also recognised manufacturing as strategically important, although they have adopted different approaches.

The Albanese Government has pursued its Future Made in Australia agenda, focusing heavily on clean energy manufacturing, critical minerals processing, battery supply chains and renewable energy technologies. Ministers argue these investments are designed to position Australia within emerging global low-emissions industries while strengthening domestic production capacity.

One Nation, by contrast, argues Australia’s industrial revival should begin with reducing the cost of conventional energy rather than accelerating the renewable energy transition.

The party says reliable coal, gas and oil production remain essential for heavy industry, mining and advanced manufacturing because these sectors require consistent electricity supplies around the clock.

The debate reflects broader divisions within Australian politics over how best to improve productivity and economic growth.

Supporters of One Nation’s approach argue lower energy prices would immediately benefit manufacturers, reduce operating costs and encourage greater domestic investment.

Critics, however, contend that long-term competitiveness increasingly depends on participation in rapidly expanding clean energy industries, advanced technologies and low-emissions manufacturing that are attracting significant international investment.

Manufacturing policy is also closely linked to broader concerns surrounding Australia’s cost of living, employment and national security.

Energy-intensive industries employ tens of thousands of Australians directly while supporting many additional jobs through local supply chains, transport, engineering services and regional communities.

Business groups have repeatedly identified electricity affordability as one of the major challenges affecting industrial competitiveness, although opinions differ sharply on the most effective policy response.

With energy expected to remain a central political issue ahead of future federal elections, One Nation is positioning its manufacturing agenda as an alternative economic strategy centred on lower power prices, expanded resource development and domestic industrial growth.

Whether voters ultimately embrace that vision will depend not only on the party’s broader electoral performance but also on continuing national debate over Australia’s energy mix, economic competitiveness and the future direction of Australian manufacturing.

Related Posts

Editorial illustration of Steven Miles and David Crisafulli in Queensland politics

Steven Miles Challenges Crisafulli Over Child Safety After Amanda Camm Quits

Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles has challenged Premier David Crisafulli to appoint an experienced replacement for Amanda Camm after she announced her decision to step down from the child safety and domestic and family violence portfolios. Miles says the choice will reveal how seriously the government takes services for vulnerable children and families. Crisafulli has praised Camm’s record and defended the reforms initiated during her term. Camm says her decision was personal and followed major surgery and an incomplete recovery. She has also referred to the stress of her ministerial workload and the impact of public harassment. Her resignation should not be portrayed as an admission that the criticism of her administration was correct. The policy dispute and the reasons she has given for leaving office are separate facts.

Editorial illustration of Sharon Freund and Michael Allen with courthouse imagery, not a photograph of proceedings

Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Watchdog Referral Amid Dispute With Michael Allen

NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has taken her challenge to a watchdog referral before the Court of Appeal amid a prolonged dispute involving Local Court Chief Judge Michael Allen. The latest proceedings concern whether decisions and observations arising from a Judicial Commission process were reached and handled lawfully. The legal contest remains unresolved, and the allegations at its centre must not be treated as disciplinary findings against either judge. Published accounts of the Court of Appeal proceedings say Freund’s lawyers have challenged the Attorney-General’s referral of her conduct to the NSW Judicial Commission. The dispute has been linked to questions about the handling of a criminal case involving a judicial colleague’s adult child and to competing allegations about procedural propriety. Those accounts remain contested, and the Court of Appeal’s task is not identical to a final disciplinary inquiry.

Editorial illustration of Angie Bell and Anne Aly, Australian parliamentary debate

Angie Bell Calls Stoning Remarks ‘Regrettable’ After Anne Aly Criticism

Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell has described her earlier parliamentary remarks about Small Business Minister Anne Aly and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as regrettable, calling them a poor choice of words after a furious public dispute over violent imagery in political debate. Bell says the comment was neither helpful nor planned, and that she withdrew it and tried to rectify the matter with Aly. The new statement follows criticism from Aly, who described the original language as racist and misogynistic. The exchange is significant not because the words have just been spoken, but because Bell has now publicly addressed them. Her expression of regret should be reported accurately without claiming that she accepted every criticism Aly made or that the parties have resolved their disagreement.

Editorial illustration of Nina Taylor and Fishermans Bend urban development

Nina Taylor Defends Fishermans Bend Plans as Rivals Demand Faster Transport

Labor MP Nina Taylor has defended the Victorian government’s approach to Fishermans Bend as rival candidates in the Albert Park electorate demanded faster public transport and better infrastructure for the growing inner-Melbourne precinct. The debate at a local election forum highlighted the gap between plans for a major urban renewal area and the transport connections residents and businesses can already use. Candidates questioned why promised tram and rail links remain distant prospects despite long-running plans to accommodate substantially more homes and jobs. Taylor pointed to recent planning steps, the Metro Tunnel and expanded bus services, while opponents pressed the government to deliver infrastructure earlier. The disagreement concerns priorities, funding and sequencing; a planning announcement should not be confused with a completed railway or tram service.

Editorial illustration of Angus Taylor and Chris Bowen with the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric project

Angus Taylor Demands Chris Bowen Resign Over Snowy 2.0 Cost Blowout

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has called for Energy Minister Chris Bowen to resign after Snowy Hydro revised the cost and completion forecast for Snowy 2.0, reviving a political argument over who is responsible for one of Australia’s most expensive energy projects. The company’s updated target is $22.2 billion, with an allowance for a cost of up to $25 billion, while commissioning is now expected in late 2029. The latest assessment is a major test for the Commonwealth-owned company and for governments of both political persuasions. Taylor was energy minister when the project was approved under the Coalition. Bowen, who oversees the project as a shareholder minister under Labor, says the early design and engineering assumptions left a lasting problem. Neither side’s political account changes the figures Australians now need to assess.

Editorial illustration of David Pocock and Anthony Albanese with parliamentary funding documents

David Pocock Challenges Albanese Over Helen Haines Funding Dossier

Independent senator David Pocock has challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s explanation of a document circulated from his office about fellow independent Helen Haines, drawing a sharp distinction between routine political briefing and material that can cast doubt on an MP’s integrity. Albanese says the file concerned Haines’s requests for funding for her electorate and was not intended as a personal attack. The row has taken on particular sensitivity after the alleged vehicle attack that left Haines critically injured. That incident is the subject of a separate criminal investigation. No established evidence links the circulation of the political document to the alleged attack or identifies political briefing as a motive. Treating the two events as causally connected would go beyond the facts.