Former Police Commander Paul O’Halloran Says Victoria’s Justice System Is ‘Broken’ As He Enters Politics

After more than four decades serving with Victoria Police, former police commander Paul O’Halloran has stepped into a very different arena, announcing his candidacy for the Liberal Party in the key marginal seat of Mordialloc ahead of Victoria’s November state election.

For O’Halloran, the move represents more than a career change. He says it is a response to what he believes has been a steady decline in community safety and confidence in Victoria’s justice system after spending more than 40 years witnessing crime from the frontline.

Speaking on Melbourne radio station 3AW, O’Halloran said his motivation was deeply personal.

Former Victoria Police commander Paul O'Halloran announces his campaign for the seat of Mordialloc

“I want my children and grandchildren to live in a safe environment with an economy that is thriving,” he said.

His campaign centres on a message that Victoria’s justice system has become “broken” and requires significant reform to restore public confidence.

O’Halloran argues that over many years the balance has shifted away from victims and towards offenders, creating frustration among frontline police officers and many members of the community.

According to him, officers are increasingly expected to perform difficult policing duties while operating under legal and operational settings that make it harder to prevent repeat offending and protect victims.

Those views place him firmly within one of the Victorian election’s major political battlegrounds, where law and order has become one of the defining issues facing both the Allan Labor Government and the Liberal opposition.

His selection as the Liberal candidate for Mordialloc is particularly significant because the electorate has traditionally been regarded as an important marginal seat capable of influencing the overall election outcome.

Located in Melbourne’s south-east, Mordialloc includes established suburban communities as well as growing residential areas. Residents frequently identify concerns including public safety, housing affordability, transport congestion and the rising cost of living.

O’Halloran says those issues are closely connected.

“A safe community and a strong economy go hand in hand,” he argues, saying families should not have to choose between financial security and personal safety.

The former commander believes the justice system has gradually lost public confidence because too many offenders avoid meaningful consequences while victims are left feeling unsupported.

His criticism reflects wider political debate occurring across Victoria over youth crime, bail laws, repeat offending and police resources.

Crime statistics and high-profile incidents have fuelled ongoing discussion about whether existing legislation adequately balances rehabilitation with community protection. Different political parties continue to propose contrasting approaches to bail reform, sentencing, policing resources and crime prevention.

Throughout his policing career, O’Halloran worked across a wide range of operational roles, including homicide investigations, organised crime, major investigations and senior command positions. His experience has earned him respect within policing circles, with colleagues recognising his lengthy operational background.

That experience is central to the credibility of his political message.

Rather than approaching community safety from an academic or purely political perspective, O’Halloran argues that his opinions have been formed through decades of direct interaction with victims, offenders and police officers across Victoria.

He says he has watched patterns of offending change over time while also observing growing pressure on frontline policing.

His campaign also extends beyond law and order.

Like many Liberal candidates contesting suburban electorates, O’Halloran is linking public safety with broader economic concerns, arguing that Victorian families are being squeezed by higher living costs, increased taxes and financial uncertainty.

He says many residents are increasingly worried about paying household bills while also expecting governments to deliver reliable public services, including policing, transport and local infrastructure.

Those concerns are likely to feature prominently throughout the election campaign as both major parties compete over cost-of-living relief and economic management.

Mordialloc itself has experienced several widely reported public order incidents during the past year, including disturbances involving groups of young people along the popular foreshore precinct during summer.

Although such incidents represent only a small proportion of overall criminal activity, they attracted widespread media attention and prompted debate over police powers, youth crime and community safety.

O’Halloran has previously indicated those events reinforced his decision to seek elected office, saying they demonstrated how quickly community confidence could be shaken when residents no longer feel secure in familiar public places.

The broader political context is equally important.

The Victorian Liberals have made crime one of their principal election issues, arguing that stronger bail laws, additional police recruitment and tougher sentencing are necessary to restore public confidence.

Labor, meanwhile, maintains it has introduced significant reforms to improve community safety while investing in policing, prevention programs and justice system improvements. The government has also argued that long-term reductions in crime require investment in early intervention alongside enforcement.

The debate illustrates the complexity of criminal justice policy.

Experts generally note that policing alone cannot eliminate crime. Effective community safety often depends upon a combination of policing, courts, rehabilitation, youth services, education, mental health support and broader economic conditions.

Successive Victorian governments from both major parties have introduced reforms attempting to balance these competing priorities.

Nevertheless, public perceptions often become heavily influenced by highly publicised violent incidents, particularly when repeat offenders or youth crime are involved.

For many voters, confidence in the justice system is shaped not only by official crime statistics but also by whether they personally feel safe walking through shopping precincts, using public transport or allowing children to travel independently.

Those perceptions can become powerful political issues regardless of broader statistical trends.

O’Halloran’s campaign therefore seeks to position him as someone who understands those concerns from firsthand experience rather than political theory.

He argues that practical policing experience gives him insight into how legislation affects officers on the street, victims navigating the justice system and communities seeking reassurance.

Whether that message resonates strongly enough to change voting patterns remains uncertain.

Mordialloc has historically been a closely contested electorate, and demographic changes continue to make its electoral outcome difficult to predict.

Both major parties are expected to devote significant resources to campaigning in the seat as polling day approaches.

Across Victoria, issues including healthcare, education, transport infrastructure, government debt, housing affordability, taxation and cost-of-living pressures are also expected to compete for voters’ attention alongside crime.

Candidates like O’Halloran will therefore need to persuade voters that community safety cannot be separated from broader economic management and government priorities.

For the former police commander, however, entering politics represents the next stage of public service rather than a departure from it.

After spending more than 40 years enforcing the law, he now hopes to influence how those laws are written.

His campaign reflects a belief that stronger public confidence in Victoria’s justice system will require both legislative change and political leadership.

Whether voters ultimately agree will become clear when Victorians head to the polls later this year, with community safety once again expected to rank among the election’s defining issues.

Related Posts

Editorial illustration of Steven Miles and David Crisafulli in Queensland politics

Steven Miles Challenges Crisafulli Over Child Safety After Amanda Camm Quits

Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles has challenged Premier David Crisafulli to appoint an experienced replacement for Amanda Camm after she announced her decision to step down from the child safety and domestic and family violence portfolios. Miles says the choice will reveal how seriously the government takes services for vulnerable children and families. Crisafulli has praised Camm’s record and defended the reforms initiated during her term. Camm says her decision was personal and followed major surgery and an incomplete recovery. She has also referred to the stress of her ministerial workload and the impact of public harassment. Her resignation should not be portrayed as an admission that the criticism of her administration was correct. The policy dispute and the reasons she has given for leaving office are separate facts.

Editorial illustration of Sharon Freund and Michael Allen with courthouse imagery, not a photograph of proceedings

Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Watchdog Referral Amid Dispute With Michael Allen

NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has taken her challenge to a watchdog referral before the Court of Appeal amid a prolonged dispute involving Local Court Chief Judge Michael Allen. The latest proceedings concern whether decisions and observations arising from a Judicial Commission process were reached and handled lawfully. The legal contest remains unresolved, and the allegations at its centre must not be treated as disciplinary findings against either judge. Published accounts of the Court of Appeal proceedings say Freund’s lawyers have challenged the Attorney-General’s referral of her conduct to the NSW Judicial Commission. The dispute has been linked to questions about the handling of a criminal case involving a judicial colleague’s adult child and to competing allegations about procedural propriety. Those accounts remain contested, and the Court of Appeal’s task is not identical to a final disciplinary inquiry.

Editorial illustration of Angie Bell and Anne Aly, Australian parliamentary debate

Angie Bell Calls Stoning Remarks ‘Regrettable’ After Anne Aly Criticism

Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell has described her earlier parliamentary remarks about Small Business Minister Anne Aly and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as regrettable, calling them a poor choice of words after a furious public dispute over violent imagery in political debate. Bell says the comment was neither helpful nor planned, and that she withdrew it and tried to rectify the matter with Aly. The new statement follows criticism from Aly, who described the original language as racist and misogynistic. The exchange is significant not because the words have just been spoken, but because Bell has now publicly addressed them. Her expression of regret should be reported accurately without claiming that she accepted every criticism Aly made or that the parties have resolved their disagreement.

Editorial illustration of Nina Taylor and Fishermans Bend urban development

Nina Taylor Defends Fishermans Bend Plans as Rivals Demand Faster Transport

Labor MP Nina Taylor has defended the Victorian government’s approach to Fishermans Bend as rival candidates in the Albert Park electorate demanded faster public transport and better infrastructure for the growing inner-Melbourne precinct. The debate at a local election forum highlighted the gap between plans for a major urban renewal area and the transport connections residents and businesses can already use. Candidates questioned why promised tram and rail links remain distant prospects despite long-running plans to accommodate substantially more homes and jobs. Taylor pointed to recent planning steps, the Metro Tunnel and expanded bus services, while opponents pressed the government to deliver infrastructure earlier. The disagreement concerns priorities, funding and sequencing; a planning announcement should not be confused with a completed railway or tram service.

Editorial illustration of Angus Taylor and Chris Bowen with the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric project

Angus Taylor Demands Chris Bowen Resign Over Snowy 2.0 Cost Blowout

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has called for Energy Minister Chris Bowen to resign after Snowy Hydro revised the cost and completion forecast for Snowy 2.0, reviving a political argument over who is responsible for one of Australia’s most expensive energy projects. The company’s updated target is $22.2 billion, with an allowance for a cost of up to $25 billion, while commissioning is now expected in late 2029. The latest assessment is a major test for the Commonwealth-owned company and for governments of both political persuasions. Taylor was energy minister when the project was approved under the Coalition. Bowen, who oversees the project as a shareholder minister under Labor, says the early design and engineering assumptions left a lasting problem. Neither side’s political account changes the figures Australians now need to assess.

Editorial illustration of David Pocock and Anthony Albanese with parliamentary funding documents

David Pocock Challenges Albanese Over Helen Haines Funding Dossier

Independent senator David Pocock has challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s explanation of a document circulated from his office about fellow independent Helen Haines, drawing a sharp distinction between routine political briefing and material that can cast doubt on an MP’s integrity. Albanese says the file concerned Haines’s requests for funding for her electorate and was not intended as a personal attack. The row has taken on particular sensitivity after the alleged vehicle attack that left Haines critically injured. That incident is the subject of a separate criminal investigation. No established evidence links the circulation of the political document to the alleged attack or identifies political briefing as a motive. Treating the two events as causally connected would go beyond the facts.