Third man charged as Sydney police expand investigation into alleged $600,000 scam targeting 88-year-old pensioner

A third man has been charged as part of an expanding investigation into an alleged year-long fraud that saw an 88-year-old Sydney man lose more than $600,000, in what New South Wales Police have described as a shocking exploitation of a vulnerable member of the community.

Financial Crimes Squad detectives arrested 26-year-old Saidu Junior Samura at Voyager Point in Sydney’s south-west following further inquiries under Strike Force Borlase. He has been charged with knowingly dealing with proceeds of crime and was refused bail after appearing before Liverpool Local Court. He is scheduled to appear before Burwood Local Court on 12 August alongside two co-accused already before the courts.

NSW Police investigating alleged $600,000 fraud targeting an elderly Sydney man

The latest arrest follows the earlier charging of brothers George Mensah, 22, and Jesse Mensah, 25, who police allege orchestrated the fraud over approximately twelve months.

According to investigators, the brothers allegedly convinced the elderly victim to provide access to his online banking and credit card accounts after falsely presenting themselves as representatives of his bank. Once access had been obtained, police allege they transferred money to themselves and other individuals while also purchasing shares using the victim’s funds.

Police further allege that Samura assisted in trading approximately $32,000 worth of shares purchased with the victim’s money before the proceeds were used to buy consumer goods online. Those allegations will be tested in court, and none of the accused has been convicted of the offences.

The investigation began after a member of the elderly man’s family noticed suspicious financial activity and alerted police. Detectives from the State Crime Command’s Financial Crimes Squad then traced the movement of funds and identified a network of transactions that allegedly linked multiple individuals to the scheme.

When the first arrests were announced earlier this month, Financial Crimes Squad Commander Detective Superintendent Gordon Arbinja described the alleged offending as “an appalling betrayal” of a vulnerable person who had relied on others for assistance rather than expecting to become the target of financial exploitation. He praised investigators for carefully reconstructing the alleged movement of money through numerous accounts and transactions.

George Mensah has been charged with two counts of dishonestly obtaining financial advantage by deception and one count of knowingly dealing with proceeds of crime.

Jesse Mensah faces similar deception and proceeds-of-crime allegations as well as an additional charge of failing to comply with a digital evidence access order. Both men were granted strict conditional bail and are due to appear before Burwood Local Court on 12 August.

Police have not alleged that the three men acted independently. Instead, investigators contend the offences formed part of a coordinated operation targeting an elderly victim over an extended period.

The case has renewed attention on the growing problem of elder financial abuse across Australia.

Older Australians are increasingly targeted through sophisticated scams, identity fraud and relationship-based deception. In many cases, offenders first establish trust before persuading victims to disclose passwords, banking credentials or credit card details. Once access is obtained, substantial sums can be transferred before suspicious activity is detected.

Financial crime specialists say older people may be particularly vulnerable because they are more likely to trust individuals claiming to represent banks, government agencies or service providers. Fraudsters often exploit confusion, isolation or limited familiarity with evolving online banking security measures.

Detective Superintendent Arbinja urged families to remain alert for signs that elderly relatives may be under pressure or being manipulated financially.

“If you think a loved one is being manipulated or pressured into handing over money or access to accounts, please come forward,” he said when announcing the investigation. He stressed that police would rather investigate concerns early than see another person lose their life savings.

One positive outcome for the victim is that his financial institution has fully reimbursed the more than $600,000 allegedly stolen from his accounts. Police confirmed the reimbursement after the investigation was launched, although criminal proceedings against the accused continue.

Authorities say the investigation remains active and further inquiries are continuing under Strike Force Borlase. Detectives have not ruled out additional arrests or charges as they continue examining the movement of funds and the involvement of other individuals.

The case serves as another reminder that financial scams are becoming increasingly organised and can involve multiple participants performing different roles. Police continue encouraging Australians to monitor elderly family members’ finances, verify unexpected requests for banking information directly with financial institutions and report suspicious activity immediately.

Related Posts

Editorial illustration of Steven Miles and David Crisafulli in Queensland politics

Steven Miles Challenges Crisafulli Over Child Safety After Amanda Camm Quits

Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles has challenged Premier David Crisafulli to appoint an experienced replacement for Amanda Camm after she announced her decision to step down from the child safety and domestic and family violence portfolios. Miles says the choice will reveal how seriously the government takes services for vulnerable children and families. Crisafulli has praised Camm’s record and defended the reforms initiated during her term. Camm says her decision was personal and followed major surgery and an incomplete recovery. She has also referred to the stress of her ministerial workload and the impact of public harassment. Her resignation should not be portrayed as an admission that the criticism of her administration was correct. The policy dispute and the reasons she has given for leaving office are separate facts.

Editorial illustration of Sharon Freund and Michael Allen with courthouse imagery, not a photograph of proceedings

Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Watchdog Referral Amid Dispute With Michael Allen

NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has taken her challenge to a watchdog referral before the Court of Appeal amid a prolonged dispute involving Local Court Chief Judge Michael Allen. The latest proceedings concern whether decisions and observations arising from a Judicial Commission process were reached and handled lawfully. The legal contest remains unresolved, and the allegations at its centre must not be treated as disciplinary findings against either judge. Published accounts of the Court of Appeal proceedings say Freund’s lawyers have challenged the Attorney-General’s referral of her conduct to the NSW Judicial Commission. The dispute has been linked to questions about the handling of a criminal case involving a judicial colleague’s adult child and to competing allegations about procedural propriety. Those accounts remain contested, and the Court of Appeal’s task is not identical to a final disciplinary inquiry.

Editorial illustration of Angie Bell and Anne Aly, Australian parliamentary debate

Angie Bell Calls Stoning Remarks ‘Regrettable’ After Anne Aly Criticism

Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell has described her earlier parliamentary remarks about Small Business Minister Anne Aly and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as regrettable, calling them a poor choice of words after a furious public dispute over violent imagery in political debate. Bell says the comment was neither helpful nor planned, and that she withdrew it and tried to rectify the matter with Aly. The new statement follows criticism from Aly, who described the original language as racist and misogynistic. The exchange is significant not because the words have just been spoken, but because Bell has now publicly addressed them. Her expression of regret should be reported accurately without claiming that she accepted every criticism Aly made or that the parties have resolved their disagreement.

Editorial illustration of Nina Taylor and Fishermans Bend urban development

Nina Taylor Defends Fishermans Bend Plans as Rivals Demand Faster Transport

Labor MP Nina Taylor has defended the Victorian government’s approach to Fishermans Bend as rival candidates in the Albert Park electorate demanded faster public transport and better infrastructure for the growing inner-Melbourne precinct. The debate at a local election forum highlighted the gap between plans for a major urban renewal area and the transport connections residents and businesses can already use. Candidates questioned why promised tram and rail links remain distant prospects despite long-running plans to accommodate substantially more homes and jobs. Taylor pointed to recent planning steps, the Metro Tunnel and expanded bus services, while opponents pressed the government to deliver infrastructure earlier. The disagreement concerns priorities, funding and sequencing; a planning announcement should not be confused with a completed railway or tram service.

Editorial illustration of Angus Taylor and Chris Bowen with the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric project

Angus Taylor Demands Chris Bowen Resign Over Snowy 2.0 Cost Blowout

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has called for Energy Minister Chris Bowen to resign after Snowy Hydro revised the cost and completion forecast for Snowy 2.0, reviving a political argument over who is responsible for one of Australia’s most expensive energy projects. The company’s updated target is $22.2 billion, with an allowance for a cost of up to $25 billion, while commissioning is now expected in late 2029. The latest assessment is a major test for the Commonwealth-owned company and for governments of both political persuasions. Taylor was energy minister when the project was approved under the Coalition. Bowen, who oversees the project as a shareholder minister under Labor, says the early design and engineering assumptions left a lasting problem. Neither side’s political account changes the figures Australians now need to assess.

Editorial illustration of David Pocock and Anthony Albanese with parliamentary funding documents

David Pocock Challenges Albanese Over Helen Haines Funding Dossier

Independent senator David Pocock has challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s explanation of a document circulated from his office about fellow independent Helen Haines, drawing a sharp distinction between routine political briefing and material that can cast doubt on an MP’s integrity. Albanese says the file concerned Haines’s requests for funding for her electorate and was not intended as a personal attack. The row has taken on particular sensitivity after the alleged vehicle attack that left Haines critically injured. That incident is the subject of a separate criminal investigation. No established evidence links the circulation of the political document to the alleged attack or identifies political briefing as a motive. Treating the two events as causally connected would go beyond the facts.