One Nation says voters are ‘doubling down’ as new polling fuels debate over Australia’s political mood

One Nation says its supporters are becoming increasingly committed as new polling suggests a significant proportion of the party’s voters remain firmly behind Pauline Hanson despite months of intense political scrutiny.

The party has highlighted findings from a recent YouGov survey indicating One Nation was polling at 26 per cent on the primary vote, with 56 per cent of its supporters describing themselves as firmly committed to voting for the party. One Nation argues the figures demonstrate that many of its voters are not simply casting protest votes but are becoming increasingly loyal supporters.

The polling has been welcomed by senior One Nation figures, including former Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce, who believes the political landscape has shifted considerably since Australians last voted at a federal election.

Pauline Hanson and Barnaby Joyce as One Nation discusses its latest polling results

“People have had a gut full, and I think that’s across Australia,” Joyce said, arguing that frustration with the major parties extends well beyond One Nation’s traditional support base. He suggested that even if One Nation did not exist, another political movement would likely emerge to capture similar voter dissatisfaction because “the world’s changed”.

Much of that frustration centres on the cost of living.

High grocery prices, rising mortgage repayments, expensive rental housing, electricity bills and insurance costs have remained among the most important issues identified by Australian voters throughout 2026. Inflation has eased from its earlier peak, but many households continue to feel financial pressure despite lower headline inflation. That environment has created opportunities for minor parties promising significant policy change.

One Nation has increasingly focused its campaign on issues including migration, housing affordability, energy policy and government spending, arguing that existing policies have weakened Australia’s economic position and reduced living standards.

The party also points to survey findings showing widespread public pessimism about the country’s direction. According to polling cited by One Nation, 51 per cent of Australians believe the country has become weaker and poorer over the past year, while only 15 per cent believe it has become stronger. The party argues those sentiments explain why increasing numbers of voters are looking beyond Labor and the Coalition.

Political analysts say One Nation’s rise has been driven by several overlapping factors rather than a single issue.

Housing affordability remains a major concern for younger Australians, while many regional communities continue expressing dissatisfaction over energy costs, agricultural policy and infrastructure spending. Immigration levels have also become a prominent issue following sustained population growth, adding further momentum to parties advocating tighter border and migration policies.

Despite those gains, polling also suggests One Nation’s recent momentum has become more volatile.

While the YouGov figures promoted by the party show support remaining historically high, more recent polling has recorded a decline from earlier peaks. The latest Sky News Pulse survey found One Nation’s primary vote slipped four percentage points to 26 per cent after a series of controversies involving party leader Pauline Hanson. Labor returned to first place on 28 per cent, while the Coalition improved to 20 per cent.

Those controversies included debate surrounding Hanson’s comments on multiculturalism, paid parental leave and appearances during a European speaking tour. Political opponents argued the issues damaged the party’s appeal among some swing voters, while One Nation maintained the polling fluctuations did not alter broader dissatisfaction with Australia’s political establishment.

Barnaby Joyce has similarly dismissed suggestions that a short-term decline in polling represents a major setback.

He has described opinion polls as useful indicators rather than election results, arguing that public sentiment continues moving away from the traditional two-party system. Joyce says Australians increasingly expect stronger responses on immigration, energy security and the cost of living.

The broader polling trend has nevertheless attracted considerable attention from political strategists.

One Nation’s support has risen substantially compared with its result at the last federal election, leading some analysts to argue Australia’s next election could become significantly less predictable than previous contests. Under Australia’s preferential voting system, strong primary vote growth does not automatically translate into parliamentary seats, but it can reshape contests across regional and outer metropolitan electorates.

Electoral experts caution that converting opinion poll support into seats remains a major challenge for any minor party.

Australia’s preferential voting system means outcomes often depend on how preferences flow after lower-polling candidates are excluded. Candidate quality, local campaigns and regional voting patterns can therefore become just as important as national polling numbers.

Political scientists also note that opinion polls represent snapshots of public opinion rather than predictions of election outcomes.

Support can change rapidly as economic conditions evolve, new policies are announced or political controversies emerge. For that reason, parties across the political spectrum continue treating individual polls with caution even while monitoring longer-term trends.

For One Nation, however, the current figures reinforce its argument that dissatisfaction with the political status quo remains widespread.

The party believes that concerns over household budgets, housing affordability and migration will continue shaping political debate over the coming months. Whether that support ultimately translates into additional parliamentary representation will depend on how voters respond when Australians next return to the ballot box.

Related Posts

Editorial illustration of Steven Miles and David Crisafulli in Queensland politics

Steven Miles Challenges Crisafulli Over Child Safety After Amanda Camm Quits

Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles has challenged Premier David Crisafulli to appoint an experienced replacement for Amanda Camm after she announced her decision to step down from the child safety and domestic and family violence portfolios. Miles says the choice will reveal how seriously the government takes services for vulnerable children and families. Crisafulli has praised Camm’s record and defended the reforms initiated during her term. Camm says her decision was personal and followed major surgery and an incomplete recovery. She has also referred to the stress of her ministerial workload and the impact of public harassment. Her resignation should not be portrayed as an admission that the criticism of her administration was correct. The policy dispute and the reasons she has given for leaving office are separate facts.

Editorial illustration of Sharon Freund and Michael Allen with courthouse imagery, not a photograph of proceedings

Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Watchdog Referral Amid Dispute With Michael Allen

NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has taken her challenge to a watchdog referral before the Court of Appeal amid a prolonged dispute involving Local Court Chief Judge Michael Allen. The latest proceedings concern whether decisions and observations arising from a Judicial Commission process were reached and handled lawfully. The legal contest remains unresolved, and the allegations at its centre must not be treated as disciplinary findings against either judge. Published accounts of the Court of Appeal proceedings say Freund’s lawyers have challenged the Attorney-General’s referral of her conduct to the NSW Judicial Commission. The dispute has been linked to questions about the handling of a criminal case involving a judicial colleague’s adult child and to competing allegations about procedural propriety. Those accounts remain contested, and the Court of Appeal’s task is not identical to a final disciplinary inquiry.

Editorial illustration of Angie Bell and Anne Aly, Australian parliamentary debate

Angie Bell Calls Stoning Remarks ‘Regrettable’ After Anne Aly Criticism

Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell has described her earlier parliamentary remarks about Small Business Minister Anne Aly and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as regrettable, calling them a poor choice of words after a furious public dispute over violent imagery in political debate. Bell says the comment was neither helpful nor planned, and that she withdrew it and tried to rectify the matter with Aly. The new statement follows criticism from Aly, who described the original language as racist and misogynistic. The exchange is significant not because the words have just been spoken, but because Bell has now publicly addressed them. Her expression of regret should be reported accurately without claiming that she accepted every criticism Aly made or that the parties have resolved their disagreement.

Editorial illustration of Nina Taylor and Fishermans Bend urban development

Nina Taylor Defends Fishermans Bend Plans as Rivals Demand Faster Transport

Labor MP Nina Taylor has defended the Victorian government’s approach to Fishermans Bend as rival candidates in the Albert Park electorate demanded faster public transport and better infrastructure for the growing inner-Melbourne precinct. The debate at a local election forum highlighted the gap between plans for a major urban renewal area and the transport connections residents and businesses can already use. Candidates questioned why promised tram and rail links remain distant prospects despite long-running plans to accommodate substantially more homes and jobs. Taylor pointed to recent planning steps, the Metro Tunnel and expanded bus services, while opponents pressed the government to deliver infrastructure earlier. The disagreement concerns priorities, funding and sequencing; a planning announcement should not be confused with a completed railway or tram service.

Editorial illustration of Angus Taylor and Chris Bowen with the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric project

Angus Taylor Demands Chris Bowen Resign Over Snowy 2.0 Cost Blowout

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has called for Energy Minister Chris Bowen to resign after Snowy Hydro revised the cost and completion forecast for Snowy 2.0, reviving a political argument over who is responsible for one of Australia’s most expensive energy projects. The company’s updated target is $22.2 billion, with an allowance for a cost of up to $25 billion, while commissioning is now expected in late 2029. The latest assessment is a major test for the Commonwealth-owned company and for governments of both political persuasions. Taylor was energy minister when the project was approved under the Coalition. Bowen, who oversees the project as a shareholder minister under Labor, says the early design and engineering assumptions left a lasting problem. Neither side’s political account changes the figures Australians now need to assess.

Editorial illustration of David Pocock and Anthony Albanese with parliamentary funding documents

David Pocock Challenges Albanese Over Helen Haines Funding Dossier

Independent senator David Pocock has challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s explanation of a document circulated from his office about fellow independent Helen Haines, drawing a sharp distinction between routine political briefing and material that can cast doubt on an MP’s integrity. Albanese says the file concerned Haines’s requests for funding for her electorate and was not intended as a personal attack. The row has taken on particular sensitivity after the alleged vehicle attack that left Haines critically injured. That incident is the subject of a separate criminal investigation. No established evidence links the circulation of the political document to the alleged attack or identifies political briefing as a motive. Treating the two events as causally connected would go beyond the facts.