Outback Wrangler star Matt Wright says he’s financially broken as police close helicopter crash investigation

Reality television personality Matt Wright says he has been left financially devastated after years of legal battles stemming from the fatal 2022 helicopter crash that claimed the life of his close friend and Outback Wrangler co-star Chris “Willow” Wilson.

Outback Wrangler star Matt Wright speaks about the aftermath of the fatal 2022 helicopter crash

The latest development comes after Northern Territory Police confirmed they have formally concluded their criminal investigation into the accident, a decision that Wright and others say leaves major questions unanswered about what actually caused the crash.

Wright revealed he has abandoned plans to appeal his criminal convictions because he has exhausted his financial resources after spending approximately $2 million defending himself through multiple court proceedings.

He also confirmed he will represent himself in an upcoming civil lawsuit brought by Danielle Wilson, the widow of Chris Wilson, because he can no longer afford legal representation.

The helicopter crash occurred on 28 February 2022 during a crocodile egg collection operation in remote West Arnhem Land.

Chris “Willow” Wilson, who was suspended beneath the helicopter on a long sling line while collecting eggs, fell to his death when the aircraft crashed.

Pilot Sebastian Robinson survived but suffered catastrophic spinal injuries that left him permanently paralysed.

The tragedy immediately became one of Australia’s highest-profile aviation investigations because of Wright’s prominence through the National Geographic series Outback Wrangler and the Netflix program Wild Croc Territory.

It is important to distinguish between two separate legal processes that followed the accident.

The criminal case against Wright did not concern responsibility for causing the helicopter crash itself.

Instead, prosecutors alleged that after the accident Wright attempted to interfere with the subsequent police investigation by making false statements about fuel levels and encouraging alterations to flight records.

Last year a jury convicted Wright on two counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice, while failing to reach a verdict on a third allegation.

Wright has consistently denied intentionally trying to obstruct investigators and has maintained that his actions were motivated by concern for his injured friend rather than any attempt to conceal wrongdoing.

Following his conviction, Wright served five months in prison before being released earlier this year.

He has since spoken publicly about the emotional toll of incarceration, describing prison as one of the most traumatic experiences of his life while also reflecting on the continuing grief over losing Wilson.

According to Wright, no punishment has been greater than living with the knowledge that his closest friend never came home from the flight.

The newest controversy centres on the decision by Northern Territory Police to officially close their criminal investigation.

While police have concluded their inquiries, Wright argues many critical questions surrounding the accident itself remain unresolved.

Supporters point to findings contained in the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) investigation, which examined the technical circumstances surrounding the crash.

Because ATSB investigations are conducted to improve aviation safety rather than determine criminal liability, their conclusions cannot generally be relied upon to establish guilt in criminal proceedings.

Wright has argued that this created a disconnect between the scientific investigation into the accident and the criminal prosecution that followed.

He says the ATSB report raised issues that deserve to be examined publicly through a coronial inquest.

Industry figures, including experienced helicopter pilots who participated in the documentary Outback Wrangler: Search for Answers, have echoed those calls.

They argue a coronial inquiry would have broader powers to examine evidence surrounding the crash itself, hear expert testimony and make recommendations aimed at improving aviation safety for future crocodile egg collection operations.

The ATSB’s investigation previously identified fuel exhaustion as a key factor contributing to the accident.

However, Wright and some supporters contend important aspects of the evidence deserve further examination in an open coronial process.

Whether such an inquiry will ultimately proceed remains uncertain.

Meanwhile, Wright’s legal difficulties are far from over.

Danielle Wilson’s civil action alleges negligence against Wright and others in connection with her husband’s death.

Unlike the completed criminal proceedings, the civil case will examine issues relating to legal responsibility and compensation under a different evidentiary standard.

Wright has indicated he intends to defend the claim but says financial realities mean he will appear without legal counsel.

The former television star says the financial consequences have extended well beyond legal fees.

His businesses have been severely affected, commercial opportunities have diminished and years of litigation have consumed resources that once supported one of northern Australia’s most recognisable tourism brands.

He describes the combined impact of criminal proceedings, civil litigation, media attention and reputational damage as leaving both his business empire and personal finances under extraordinary strain.

Despite the latest developments, Wright continues insisting that the full story surrounding the helicopter crash has yet to be publicly examined.

He says closing the police investigation does not provide the answers sought by either Wilson’s family or those involved in the accident response.

“No answers” has become the central theme of his recent public appearances, with Wright arguing that only an independent coronial inquest can comprehensively examine all available evidence and determine whether further safety recommendations are required.

For the Wilson family, however, the focus remains on obtaining accountability through the courts following the loss of a husband and father.

As the civil proceedings move closer, both families continue living with the consequences of a tragedy that transformed lives, careers and friendships.

Although the criminal investigation has now concluded, the broader legal and emotional aftermath of the 2022 crash is far from over.

Related Posts

Editorial illustration of Steven Miles and David Crisafulli in Queensland politics

Steven Miles Challenges Crisafulli Over Child Safety After Amanda Camm Quits

Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles has challenged Premier David Crisafulli to appoint an experienced replacement for Amanda Camm after she announced her decision to step down from the child safety and domestic and family violence portfolios. Miles says the choice will reveal how seriously the government takes services for vulnerable children and families. Crisafulli has praised Camm’s record and defended the reforms initiated during her term. Camm says her decision was personal and followed major surgery and an incomplete recovery. She has also referred to the stress of her ministerial workload and the impact of public harassment. Her resignation should not be portrayed as an admission that the criticism of her administration was correct. The policy dispute and the reasons she has given for leaving office are separate facts.

Editorial illustration of Sharon Freund and Michael Allen with courthouse imagery, not a photograph of proceedings

Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Watchdog Referral Amid Dispute With Michael Allen

NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has taken her challenge to a watchdog referral before the Court of Appeal amid a prolonged dispute involving Local Court Chief Judge Michael Allen. The latest proceedings concern whether decisions and observations arising from a Judicial Commission process were reached and handled lawfully. The legal contest remains unresolved, and the allegations at its centre must not be treated as disciplinary findings against either judge. Published accounts of the Court of Appeal proceedings say Freund’s lawyers have challenged the Attorney-General’s referral of her conduct to the NSW Judicial Commission. The dispute has been linked to questions about the handling of a criminal case involving a judicial colleague’s adult child and to competing allegations about procedural propriety. Those accounts remain contested, and the Court of Appeal’s task is not identical to a final disciplinary inquiry.

Editorial illustration of Angie Bell and Anne Aly, Australian parliamentary debate

Angie Bell Calls Stoning Remarks ‘Regrettable’ After Anne Aly Criticism

Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell has described her earlier parliamentary remarks about Small Business Minister Anne Aly and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as regrettable, calling them a poor choice of words after a furious public dispute over violent imagery in political debate. Bell says the comment was neither helpful nor planned, and that she withdrew it and tried to rectify the matter with Aly. The new statement follows criticism from Aly, who described the original language as racist and misogynistic. The exchange is significant not because the words have just been spoken, but because Bell has now publicly addressed them. Her expression of regret should be reported accurately without claiming that she accepted every criticism Aly made or that the parties have resolved their disagreement.

Editorial illustration of Nina Taylor and Fishermans Bend urban development

Nina Taylor Defends Fishermans Bend Plans as Rivals Demand Faster Transport

Labor MP Nina Taylor has defended the Victorian government’s approach to Fishermans Bend as rival candidates in the Albert Park electorate demanded faster public transport and better infrastructure for the growing inner-Melbourne precinct. The debate at a local election forum highlighted the gap between plans for a major urban renewal area and the transport connections residents and businesses can already use. Candidates questioned why promised tram and rail links remain distant prospects despite long-running plans to accommodate substantially more homes and jobs. Taylor pointed to recent planning steps, the Metro Tunnel and expanded bus services, while opponents pressed the government to deliver infrastructure earlier. The disagreement concerns priorities, funding and sequencing; a planning announcement should not be confused with a completed railway or tram service.

Editorial illustration of Angus Taylor and Chris Bowen with the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric project

Angus Taylor Demands Chris Bowen Resign Over Snowy 2.0 Cost Blowout

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has called for Energy Minister Chris Bowen to resign after Snowy Hydro revised the cost and completion forecast for Snowy 2.0, reviving a political argument over who is responsible for one of Australia’s most expensive energy projects. The company’s updated target is $22.2 billion, with an allowance for a cost of up to $25 billion, while commissioning is now expected in late 2029. The latest assessment is a major test for the Commonwealth-owned company and for governments of both political persuasions. Taylor was energy minister when the project was approved under the Coalition. Bowen, who oversees the project as a shareholder minister under Labor, says the early design and engineering assumptions left a lasting problem. Neither side’s political account changes the figures Australians now need to assess.

Editorial illustration of David Pocock and Anthony Albanese with parliamentary funding documents

David Pocock Challenges Albanese Over Helen Haines Funding Dossier

Independent senator David Pocock has challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s explanation of a document circulated from his office about fellow independent Helen Haines, drawing a sharp distinction between routine political briefing and material that can cast doubt on an MP’s integrity. Albanese says the file concerned Haines’s requests for funding for her electorate and was not intended as a personal attack. The row has taken on particular sensitivity after the alleged vehicle attack that left Haines critically injured. That incident is the subject of a separate criminal investigation. No established evidence links the circulation of the political document to the alleged attack or identifies political briefing as a motive. Treating the two events as causally connected would go beyond the facts.